Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 9 , Pages 1147-1153 , September 2007

Assessing Hip Abduction and Adduction Strength: Can Greater Segmental Fixation Enhance the Reproducibility?

Presented in part to the British Association of Sports and Exercise Medicine, October 2006, Oxford, U.K.

  • Dhruvkumar Laheru, BSc
  • ,
  • Jack C. Kerr, MSc
  • ,
  • Alison H. McGregor, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Alison H. McGregor, PhD, Reader in Biodynamics, Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Div of Surgery, Oncology, Reproductive Biology and Anaesthetics, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK

  • Image Result

    A photograph showing the projection and securing of the ruler maker at the level of the ASIS.

    A photograph showing the projection and securing of the ruler maker at the level of the ASIS.

  • Image Result

    (A) A photograph showing a subject being secured as per the instructions provided by the manufacturer (setup A). (B) A photograph showing a subject secured in the novel setup described (setup B).

    (A) A photograph showing a subject being secured as per the instructions provided by the manufacturer (setup A). (B) A photograph showing a subject secured in the novel setup described (setup B).

  • Image Result

    A schematic diagram detailing the protocol of exercises undertaken for hip abduction and adduction with the Cybex dynamometer. The diagram shows the exercise sequence per side of testing.

    A schematic diagram detailing the protocol of exercises undertaken for hip abduction and adduction with the Cybex dynamometer. The diagram shows the exercise sequence per side of testing.

  • Image Result

    Isokinetic abduction (right side) at 30°/s. The graph shows the distribution of data with mean abduction torques between weeks 1 and 2 (x axis) against the difference in means between the 2 weeks (y a

    Isokinetic abduction (right side) at 30°/s. The graph shows the distribution of data with mean abduction torques between weeks 1 and 2 (x axis) against the difference in means between the 2 weeks (y axis). The horizontal lines represent the limits of repeatability (the distribution of 95% of the data; ±2 standard deviations from the mean).

  • Image Result
    Isokinetic abduction at 30°/s. The graph shows the relationship between the mean abduction torque (adjusted for mass) and the maximum angle of pelvic rotation (in the transverse plane). Left and right

    Isokinetic abduction at 30°/s. The graph shows the relationship between the mean abduction torque (adjusted for mass) and the maximum angle of pelvic rotation (in the transverse plane). Left and right sides shown together.

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)00381-4

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.017

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 9 , Pages 1147-1153 , September 2007