Journal Home
Search for

Volume 88, Issue 9, Pages 1147-1153 (September 2007)


View previous. 13 of 387 View next.

Assessing Hip Abduction and Adduction Strength: Can Greater Segmental Fixation Enhance the Reproducibility?

Presented in part to the British Association of Sports and Exercise Medicine, October 2006, Oxford, U.K.

Dhruvkumar Laheru, BSc, Jack C. Kerr, MSc, Alison H. McGregor, PhDCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Abstract 

Laheru D, Kerr JC, McGregor AH. Assessing hip abduction and adduction strength: can greater segmental fixation enhance the reproducibility?

Objective

To improve the reproducibility of testing hip abduction and adduction using an isokinetic dynamometer by a novel testing protocol.

Design

Test-retest design.

Setting

Biodynamics laboratory.

Participants

Fifteen healthy subjects (9 men, 6 women; age, 22.4±0.5y) were recruited.

Interventions

Two setups were compared: the first according to manufacturer’s guidelines (setup A) and the second a novel setup incorporating pelvic fixation (setup B). Setups A and B were performed in a random order. Both setups included the same battery of isokinetic (30°/s, 60°/s) and isometric tests, and were repeated 1 week later.

Main Outcome Measures

The peak torque for each abduction and adduction exercise was noted and pelvic motion during testing was recorded.

Results

Setup B significantly (P<.05) reduced transverse pelvic rotation by between 7.5° and 8.0° dependent on test speed. Mean differences for reproducibility of peak torque, ranged from 0.8 to 11.7Nm. The coefficients of repeatability of both setups were similar, ranging from 21.4 to 56.3Nm across isokinetic exercises. A similar observation was noted for isometric exercises, with the differences between the coefficients of repeatability ranging from 18.6 to 40.0Nm.

Conclusions

Reducing pelvic rotation does not enhance reproducibility of the system and is not related to torque production. Further research is required to determine the optimal test setup.

Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Division of Surgery, Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London, U.K.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Alison H. McGregor, PhD, Reader in Biodynamics, Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Div of Surgery, Oncology, Reproductive Biology and Anaesthetics, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)00381-4

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.017


View previous. 13 of 387 View next.