Journal Home
Search for

Volume 88, Issue 8, Pages 1002-1008 (August 2007)


View previous. 11 of 29 View next.

Quantitative and Clinical Description of Postural Instability in Women With Breast Cancer Treated With Taxane Chemotherapy

Presented, in part, to the American Physical Therapy Association Combined Sections meeting, February 1–5, 2006, San Diego, CA; the Supportive Oncology meeting, October 6–8, 2005, Chicago, IL; and the International Society of Posture and Gait Research XVIIth Conference, May 29–June 2, 2005, Marseille, France.

Meredith A. Wampler, PT, DPTScaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Kimberly S. Topp, PT, PhDb, Christine Miaskowski, RN, PhDc, Nancy N. Byl, PT, PhDb, Hope S. Rugo, MDd, Kate Hamel, PhDe

Abstract 

Wampler MA, Topp KS, Miaskowski C, Byl NN, Rugo HS, Hamel K. Quantitative and clinical description of postural instability in women with breast cancer treated with taxane chemotherapy.

Objective

To describe the postural control of women who received taxane chemotherapy for treatment of breast cancer using quantitative and clinically feasible measures.

Design

Prospective descriptive study.

Setting

University-based comprehensive cancer center.

Participants

Twenty women who completed taxane treatment for breast cancer and 20 healthy controls participated in this study.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Two quantitative measures of postural control were used, Sensory Organization Test (SOT) and center of pressure (COP) velocities. Two clinically feasible measures of postural control were used, the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (FABS) and Timed Up & Go (TUG) test.

Results

Compared with healthy controls, women with breast cancer had poorer postural control on all of the outcome measures. FABS and TUG scores correlated moderately with SOT and COP scores.

Conclusions

After taxane chemotherapy, women with breast cancer show significantly increased postural instability compared with matched controls. Clinically feasible measures of postural control correlated with quantitative tests. These results suggest that these clinical measures may be useful to screen patients to determine who may benefit from rehabilitation.

a Department of Rehabilitation, Harrison Medical Center, Bremerton, WA

b Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California School of Medicine, and Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA

c Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California School of Nursing, San Francisco, CA

d School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA

e Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Meredith A. Wampler, PT, DPTSc, Harrison Medical Center, Rehabilitation Services, 2520 Cherry Ave, Bremerton, WA 98310

 Supported by the California Breast Cancer Research Program, dissertation award (grant no. 10GB-0001).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)00350-4

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.007


View previous. 11 of 29 View next.