Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 8 , Pages 1042-1048, August 2007

Pain Perception After Running a 100-Mile Ultramarathon

  • Martin D. Hoffman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Veterans Affairs, Northern California Health Care System, and University of California-Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Martin D. Hoffman, MD, Dept of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (117), Sacramento VA Medical Center, 10535 Hospital Way, Mather, CA 95655-1200
  • ,
  • Jean Lee, MS, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Veterans Affairs, Northern California Health Care System, and University of California-Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
  • ,
  • Holly Zhao, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Veterans Affairs, Northern California Health Care System, and University of California-Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
  • ,
  • Alex Tsodikov, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Abstract 

Hoffman MD, Lee J, Zhao H, Tsodikov A. Pain perception after running a 100-mile ultramarathon.

Objective

To determine if pain perception is affected by an extreme bout of exercise that causes ongoing exercise-related pain.

Design

Repeated-measures design.

Setting

Pre-race registration area and finish area of an endurance race.

Participants

Twenty-one competitors in the 2005 Western States 100 Mile Endurance Run and 11 control subjects who were assisting at the race but not running.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Overall pain and pain ratings on a pressure pain test before and after the event.

Results

Mean overall pain ± standard deviation on a 100-mm scale increased (P<.05) from 3±6mm before the run to 39±28mm after the run among the runners. The faster runners showed a mean reduction (P<.05) in pain ratings after the race of 15±20mm (on a 100-mm scale), whereas there was no change for the slower runners and controls. Findings were confirmed by model-based analysis.

Conclusions

The faster runners in a 100-mile (161-km) running race experience a modest temporary reduction in pressure pain perception that does not appear to be augmented by ongoing pain related to the exercise. The lack of a reduction in pain perception among the slower runners may be because an extreme bout of exercise of this nature can “exhaust” the systems responsible for exercise-induced analgesia in all but the most well-trained of runners, or that these systems were not activated because the slower runners were unable to maintain a high enough exercise intensity during the later stages of the race.

Key Words: Analgesia, Exercise, Pain, Pain threshold, Physical effort, Rehabilitation

 

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)00330-9

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.004

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 8 , Pages 1042-1048, August 2007