A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Implantable 2-Channel Peroneal Nerve Stimulator on Walking Speed and Activity in Poststroke Hemiplegia
Abstract
Kottink AI, Hermens HJ, Nene AV, Tenniglo MJ, van der Aa HE, Buschman HP, IJzerman MJ. A randomized controlled trial of an implantable 2-channel peroneal nerve stimulator on walking speed and activity in poststroke hemiplegia.
Objective
To determine the effect of a new implantable 2-channel peroneal nerve stimulator on walking speed and daily activities, in comparison with the usual treatment in chronic stroke survivors with a drop foot.
Design
Randomized controlled trial.
Setting
All subjects were measured 5 times in the gait laboratory.
Participants
Twenty-nine stroke survivors with chronic hemiplegia with drop foot who fulfill the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study.
Intervention
The intervention group received an implantable 2-channel peroneal nerve stimulator for correction of their drop foot. The control group continued using their conventional walking device, consisting of an ankle-foot orthosis, orthopedic shoes, or no device.
Main Outcome Measures
Walking speed, assessed both by a six-minute walk test (6MWT) and by using a 10-m walkway, was selected as primary outcome measure and activity monitoring data, consisting of percentage time spent on stepping, standing, and sitting/lying were selected as secondary outcome measure.
Results
Functional electric stimulation (FES) resulted in a 23% improvement of walking speed measured with the 6MWT, whereas the improvement in the control group was only 3% (P=.010). Comfortable walking speed measured on a 10-m walkway was also significantly improved in favor of FES (P=.038). The percentage time spent on stepping deteriorated with 3% in the intervention and 0.8% in control group, which was not statistically significant between both groups (P=.13).
Conclusions
The present study shows a clinically relevant effect of the implantable 2-channel peroneal nerve stimulator on walking speed in the sample of stroke survivors included in our study.
aRoessingh Research and Development, Enschede, The Netherlands
bInstitute for Biomedical Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
cRoessingh Rehabilitation Center, Enschede, The Netherlands
dDepartment Neurosurgery Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
eTwente Institute for Neuromodulation, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
fBiomedical Signals & Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Reprint requests to Anke I. Kottink, MSc, Roessingh Research and Development, PO Box 310, 7500 AH, Enschede, The Netherlands
Supported by the European Eureka program, the Department of Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs in The Hague, The Netherlands; the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport in The Hague, The Netherlands; and St Hubertus Foundation, The Netherlands.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.