Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 8 , Pages 955-963, August 2007

Circuit Class Therapy Versus Individual Physiotherapy Sessions During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Controlled Trial

  • Coralie K. English, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia
    • Physiotherapy Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Coralie K. English, PhD, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
  • ,
  • Susan L. Hillier, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia
  • ,
  • Kathy R. Stiller, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Physiotherapy Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia.
  • ,
  • Andrea Warden-Flood, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia
    • Deceased.

Abstract 

English CK, Hillier SL, Stiller KR, Warden-Flood A. Circuit class therapy versus individual physiotherapy sessions during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a controlled trial.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of circuit class therapy and individual physiotherapy (PT) sessions in improving walking ability and functional balance for people recovering from stroke.

Design

Nonrandomized, single-blind controlled trial.

Setting

Medical rehabilitation ward of a rehabilitation hospital.

Participants

Sixty-eight persons receiving inpatient rehabilitation after a stroke.

Interventions

Subjects received group circuit class therapy or individual treatment sessions as the sole method of PT service delivery for the duration of their inpatient stay.

Main Outcome Measures

Five-meter walk test (5MWT), two-minute walk test (2MWT), and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) measured 4 weeks after admission. Secondary outcome measures included the Iowa Level of Assistance Scale, Motor Assessment Scale upper-limb items, and patient satisfaction. Measures were taken on admission and 4 weeks later.

Results

Subjects in both groups showed significant improvements between admission and week 4 in all primary outcome measures. There were no significant between group differences in the primary outcome measures at week 4 (5MWT mean difference, .07m/s; 2MWT mean difference, 1.8m; BBS mean difference, 3.9 points). A significantly higher proportion of subjects in the circuit class therapy group were able to walk independently at discharge (P=.01) and were satisfied with the amount of therapy received (P=.007).

Conclusions

Circuit class therapy appeared as effective as individual PT sessions for this sample of subjects receiving inpatient rehabilitation poststroke. Favorable results for circuit classes in terms of increased walking independence and patient satisfaction suggest this model of service delivery warrants further investigation.

Key Words: Cerebrovascular accident, Physical therapy modalities, Rehabilitation

 

 Supported by the Australian Physiotherapy Association Physiotherapy Research Foundation and the Royal Adelaide Hospital Allied Health Group.

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

 Reprints are not available from the author.

PII: S0003-9993(07)00298-5

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.04.010

Refers to erratum:

  • Correction

    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation October 2007 (Vol. 88, Issue 10, Page 1364)

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 8 , Pages 955-963, August 2007