Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 7 , Pages 877-884 , July 2007

The Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties

Presented in part to the Rehabilitation Psychology Conference, April 2005, Baltimore, MD.

  • Kathleen B. Kortte, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Kathleen B. Kortte, PhD, Dept of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Phipps 174, Baltimore, MD 21205
    • ,
  • Lara D. Falk, BA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
    • ,
  • Renan C. Castillo, MS

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
    • ,
  • Doug Johnson-Greene, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
    • ,
  • Stephen T. Wegener, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

References 

  1. Cifu D, Stewart D. Factors affecting functional outcome after stroke: a critical review of rehabilitation interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:S35–S39
  2. Moffet H, Collet JP, Shapiro SH, Paradis G, Marquis F, Roy L. Effectiveness of intensive rehabilitation on functional ability and quality of life after first total knee arthroplasty: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:546–556
  3. Munin MC, Seligman K, Dew MA, et al. Effect of rehabilitation site on functional recovery after hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:367–372
  4. Yagura H, Miyai I, Seike Y, Suzuki T, Yanagihara T. Benefit of inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation up to 1 year after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1687–1691
  5. Freburger JK. An analysis of the relationship between the utilization of physical therapy services and outcomes for patients with acute stroke. Phys Ther. 1999;79:906–918
  6. Freburger JK. Analysis of the relationship between the utilization of physical therapy services and outcomes of care for patients after total hip arthroplasty. Phys Ther. 2000;80:448–458
  7. Fiedler RC, Granger CV, Russell CF. UDSmrsm: follow-up data on patients discharged in 1994-1996 (Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation). Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79:184–192
  8. Resnick B, Zimmerman S, Magaziner J, Adelman A. Use of the Apathy Evaluation Scale as a measure of motivation in elderly people. Rehabil Nurs. 1998;23:141–147
  9. Lenze EJ, Munin MC, Dew MA, et al. Adverse effects of depression and cognitive impairment on rehabilitation participation and recovery from hip fracture. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;19:472–478
  10. Geelen R, Soons P. Rehabilitation: an ‘everyday’ motivation model. Patient Educ Couns. 1996;28:69–77
  11. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. Qualitative analysis of stroke patients’ motivation for rehabilitation. BMJ. 2000;321:1051–1054
  12. Faller H. [Shared decision making: an approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation] [German] Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003;42:129–135
  13. Jeffrey D. Cognitive clarity: key to motivation in rehabilitation. J Rehabil. 1981;47:33–35
  14. Kortte KB, Wegener ST. Denial of illness in medical rehabilitation populations: theory, research, and definition. Rehabil Psychol. 2004;49:187–199
  15. Lenze EJ, Munin MC, Quear T, et al. The Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale: reliability and validity of a clinician-rated measure of participation in acute rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:380–384
  16. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR, Fanjiang G. Mini-Mental State Examination: user’s guide. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2001;
  17. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:127–132
  18. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM). Scand J Rehabil Med. 1994;26:115–119
  19. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1226–1232
  20. Bottemiller KL, Bieber PL, Basford JR, Harris M. FIM score, FIM efficiency, and discharge disposition following inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Rehabil Nurs. 2006;31:22–25
  21. Chae J, Zorowitz R, Johnston M. Functional outcome of hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic stroke patients after in patient rehabilitation: a matched comparison. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;75:177–182
  22. Derogatis L. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): administration, scoring and procedures manual. 3rd ed. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems; 1993;
  23. Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N. The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med. 1983;13:595–605
  24. MacNeill SE, Lichtenberg PA. Predictors for functional outcome in older rehabilitation patients. Rehabil Psychol. 1998;43:246–257
  25. Mast BT, MacNeill SE, Lichtenberg PA. Geropsychological problems in medical rehabilitation: dementia and depression among stroke and lower extremity fracture patients. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999;54:M607–M612
  26. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063–1070
  27. Levine J, Warrenburg S, Kerns R, et al. The role of denial in recovery from coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med. 1987;49:109–117
  28. Jacobsen B, Lowery B. Further analysis of the psychometric properties of the Levine Denial of Illness Scale. Psychosom Med. 1992;54:372–381
  29. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:519–525
  30. Bradley JV. The insidious L-shaped distribution. Bull Psychonomic Soc. 1982;20:85–88
  31. Rossner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 5th ed. Pacific Grove: Duxbury Pr; 2000;
  32. Nunnally J. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978;
  33. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;2:420–428
  34. Andresen EM, Catlin TK, Wyrwich KW, Jackson-Thompson J. Retest reliability of surveillance questions on health related quality of life. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:339–343
  35. Raat H, Botterweck A, Landgraf JM, Hoogeveen WC, Essink-Bot ML. Reliability and validity of the short form of the child health questionnaire for parents (CHQ-PF28) in large random school based and general population samples. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:75–82
  36. Kachigan S. Statistical analysis: an interdisciplinary introduction to univariate and multivariate methods. New York: Radius Pr; 1986;
  37. Miller RG. Simultaneous statistical inference. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Verlag; 1981;
  38. Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55:305–312

 Supported in part by the American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Psychologists and Social Workers and the Medstar Research Institute.No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is\are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)00256-0

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.030

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 7 , Pages 877-884 , July 2007

Article Tools