Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 5 , Pages 597-603 , May 2007

Cancer Screening Behaviors Among Canadian Women Living With Physical Disabilities

  • Nicole S. Cooper, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • Karen K. Yoshida, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
    • Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Karen K. Yoshida, PhD, Dept of Physical Therapy and Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of Toronto, 500 University Ave, 8th Fl, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada

References 

  1. Maxwell CJ, Bancej CM, Snider J, Vik SA. Factors important in promoting cervical cancer screening among Canadian women: findings from the 1996-97 National Population Health Survey (NPHS). Can J Public Health. 2001;92:127–133
  2. Fitch MI, Greenberg M, Cava M, Spaner D, Taylor K. Exploring the barriers to cervical screening in an urban Canadian setting. Cancer Nurs. 1998;21:441–449
  3. Snider JA, Beauvais JE. Pap smear utilization in Canada: estimates after adjusting the eligible population for hysterectomy status. Chronic Dis Can. 1998;19:19–24
  4. Snider J, Beauvais J, Levy I, Villeneuve P, Pennock J. Trends in mammography and Pap smear utilization in Canada. Chronic Dis Can. 1996;17:108–117
  5. Lipskie TL. A summary of cancer screening guidelines. Chronic Dis Can. 1998;19:112–130
  6. Welner SL, Foley CC, Nosek MA, Holmes A. Practical considerations in the performance of physical examinations on women with disabilities. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1999;54:457–462
  7. Centers for Disease Control. Use of cervical and breast screening among women with and without functional limitations—United States, 1994-1995. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 1998;47:853–856
  8. Chan L, Doctor JN, MacLehose RF, et al. Do Medicare patients with disabilities receive preventive services? (A population-based study). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:642–646
  9. Nosek MA, Howland CA. Breast and cervical cancer screening among women with physical disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(12 Suppl 5):S39–S44
  10. Shabas D, Weinreb H. Preventive healthcare in women with multiple sclerosis. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9:389–395
  11. Cheng E, Myers L, Wolf S, et al. Mobility impairments and use of preventive services in women with multiple sclerosis: observational study. BMJ. 2001;323:968–969
  12. Steinberg AG, Wiggins EA, Barmada CH, Sullivan VJ. Deaf women: experiences and perceptions of healthcare system access. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2002;11:729–741
  13. Nosek MA. Use of cervical and breast cancer screening among women with and without functional limitations—United States, 1994-1995. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 1998;47:853–856
  14. Statistics Canada. National Population Health Survey supplement, 1994-1995. Available from: URL:http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/82F0068XIE/about_e.pdf. Accessed January 25, 2007.
  15. Dillman D. Mail and telephone surveys: total design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1978;
  16. Iezzoni LI, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Siebens H. Mobility impairments and use of screening and preventive services. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:955–961
  17. Thomas C. Medicine, gender, and disability: disabled women’s health care encounters. Health Care Women Int. 2001;22:245–262
  18. Riddell L, Greenberg K, Meister J, Kornelsen J. We’re women, too: identifying barriers to gynecologic and breast health care for women with disabilities. Vancouver: British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health; 2003;
  19. Kroll T, Jones GC, Kehn M, Neri MT. Barriers and strategies affecting the utilisation of primary preventive services for people with physical disabilities: a qualitative inquiry. Health Soc Care Community. 2006;14:284–293
  20. Iezzoni LI, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Harris-David L, O’Day B. Use of screening and preventive services among women with disabilities. Am J Med Qual. 2001;16:135–144

 Supported by the Social Science Humanities Research Council (project no. 816-97-0042).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)00112-8

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.014

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 5 , Pages 597-603 , May 2007