Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 5 , Pages 589-596, May 2007

What Patient Attributes Are Associated With Thoughts of Suing a Physician?

  • David A. Fishbain, MD

      Affiliations

    • Rosomoff Comprehensive Pain & Rehabilitation Center, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    • Department of Psychiatry, Veterans Administration Hospital, Miami, FL
  • ,
  • Daniel Bruns, PsyD

      Affiliations

    • Health Psychology Associates, Greeley, CO
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Daniel Bruns, PsyD, 1275 58th Ave, Ste C, Greeley, CO 80634
  • ,
  • J. Mark Disorbio, EdD

      Affiliations

    • Integrated Therapies, Lakewood, CO.
  • ,
  • John E. Lewis, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL

Abstract 

Fishbain DA, Bruns D, Disorbio JM, Lewis JE. What patient attributes are associated with thoughts of suing a physician?

Objective

To address a neglected research area: the attributes of rehabilitation patients associated with “thoughts of suing a physician” (S-MD).

Design

The S-MD statement “I am thinking about suing one of my doctors” was administered to 2264 people, along with the Battery for Health Improvement (BHI 2). Items predictive of S-MD were identified.

Setting

Acute physical therapy, work hardening programs, chronic pain programs, physician offices, and vocational rehabilitation programs.

Participants

Participants included 777 rehabilitation patients and 1487 nonpatient community-dwellers.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

We used a multivariate analysis of variance to determine which of the 18 BHI 2 scales predicted the S-MD statement. Items from the scales found to be predictive, plus other variables, were then used in a chi-square analysis that compared people who wished to sue with those who did not. We then used a stepwise regression analysis with significant items from the prior analyses to build a model for predicting a potential S-MD patient.

Results

The highest percentage (11.5%) of patients affirming the S-MD statement were those involved in workers’ compensation and personal injury litigation, compared with only 1.9% of community-living subjects. Stepwise regression of BHI 2 variables produced a 13-variable model explaining 38.04% of the variance. A logistic regression of demographic variables (eg, education, ethnicity, litigiousness) explained 20% of the variance.

Conclusions

Anger (P<.001), mistrust (P<.001), a focus on compensation (P<.001), addiction (P<.001), severe childhood punishments (P<.001), having attended college (P<.001), and other patient variables were associated with thoughts of suing a physician.

Key Words: Malpractice, Rehabilitation

 

 This study was conducted without external funding. The study, however, reanalyzed data from a previous study that was funded and supported by Pearson Assessments.

 A commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a financial benefit upon 1 or more of the authors. Bruns and Disorbio receive Battery for Health Improvement 2 royalties.

PII: S0003-9993(07)00104-9

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.007

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 5 , Pages 589-596, May 2007