Volume 88, Issue 5 , Pages 626-631, May 2007
Test-Retest Reliability of Isokinetic Knee Extension and Flexion
Abstract
Sole G, Hamrén J, Milosavljevic S, Nicholson H, Sullivan SJ. Test-retest reliability of isokinetic knee extension and flexion.
Objective
To assess reliability of isokinetic peak torque and work for knee flexion and extension.
Design
Single-group test-retest.
Setting
University laboratory.
Participants
Eleven men and 7 women (mean age, 21y).
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure
Peak torque and work for concentric and eccentric knee extension and flexion were recorded at 60°/s for 3 trials on 2 occasions. Intraclass correlation coefficient model 3,1 (ICC3,1), standard error (SE) of measurements, and smallest real differences were calculated for the maximum and for the mean peak torque and work of the 3 repetitions.
Results
Relative reliability was “very high” for peak torque and work (ICC range, >.90). The SE measurements ranged between 5% and 10% of the initial values for both peak torque and work. The smallest change that indicates a real improvement for a single subject (smallest real differences) ranged from 12% to 25% for peak torque and work variables and from 25% to 30% for the peak torque ratios.
Conclusions
Isokinetic concentric and eccentric knee extensor and flexor strength variables are reliable when measured by the same examiner in asymptomatic subjects.
Key Words: Exercise therapy, Knee injuries, Rehabilitation, Reproducibility of results, Thigh, Treatment outcome
Supported by the Physiotherapy Research Trust, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago (research grant-in-aid).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(07)00103-7
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.006
© 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 88, Issue 5 , Pages 626-631, May 2007
