Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 5 , Pages 626-631, May 2007

Test-Retest Reliability of Isokinetic Knee Extension and Flexion

  • Gisela Sole, BSc(Physio), MSc(Med)

      Affiliations

    • Centre of Physiotherapy Research at the School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Gisela Sole, BSc(Physio), MSc(Med), University of Otago, Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand
  • ,
  • Jonas Hamrén, BSc(Physio)

      Affiliations

    • Department for Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
  • ,
  • Stephan Milosavljevic, BAppSc(Physio), PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre of Physiotherapy Research at the School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
  • ,
  • Helen Nicholson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anatomy and Structural Biology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
  • ,
  • S. John Sullivan, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre of Physiotherapy Research at the School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Abstract 

Sole G, Hamrén J, Milosavljevic S, Nicholson H, Sullivan SJ. Test-retest reliability of isokinetic knee extension and flexion.

Objective

To assess reliability of isokinetic peak torque and work for knee flexion and extension.

Design

Single-group test-retest.

Setting

University laboratory.

Participants

Eleven men and 7 women (mean age, 21y).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

Peak torque and work for concentric and eccentric knee extension and flexion were recorded at 60°/s for 3 trials on 2 occasions. Intraclass correlation coefficient model 3,1 (ICC3,1), standard error (SE) of measurements, and smallest real differences were calculated for the maximum and for the mean peak torque and work of the 3 repetitions.

Results

Relative reliability was “very high” for peak torque and work (ICC range, >.90). The SE measurements ranged between 5% and 10% of the initial values for both peak torque and work. The smallest change that indicates a real improvement for a single subject (smallest real differences) ranged from 12% to 25% for peak torque and work variables and from 25% to 30% for the peak torque ratios.

Conclusions

Isokinetic concentric and eccentric knee extensor and flexor strength variables are reliable when measured by the same examiner in asymptomatic subjects.

Key Words: Exercise therapy, Knee injuries, Rehabilitation, Reproducibility of results, Thigh, Treatment outcome

 

 Supported by the Physiotherapy Research Trust, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago (research grant-in-aid).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(07)00103-7

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.006

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 5 , Pages 626-631, May 2007