« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 4
, Pages
481-488
, April 2007
Development and Psychometric Properties of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Transfers for Caregivers of Children Requiring Transfer Assistance
-
Construct validity key map indicating the hierarchical order for indoor transfers (shaded bars) versus outdoor transfers (unshaded bars) noting adverse and optimal conditions. NOTE. N=71; items=14. Ab
Construct validity key map indicating the hierarchical order for indoor transfers (shaded bars) versus outdoor transfers (unshaded bars) noting adverse and optimal conditions. NOTE. N=71; items=14. Abbreviations: M, mean; S, 1 SD; T, 2 SDs.
-
Graphic representation of item difficulty compared with caregivers’ self-efficacy scores. NOTE. Numbers correspond to items on the CSEST in placement of perceived item difficulty. Abbreviations: a, adGraphic representation of item difficulty compared with caregivers’ self-efficacy scores. NOTE. Numbers correspond to items on the CSEST in placement of perceived item difficulty. Abbreviations: a, adverse transfer condition in item; o, optimal transfer condition in item; X, caregivers’ scores (N=71).
Supported, in part, by College of Graduate Studies, University of Toledo (research support award).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(07)00057-3
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.01.019
© 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 88, Issue 4
, Pages
481-488
, April 2007
