| | American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine in 2006: Embracing the FuturePresented to the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, September 2006, Boston, MA. Abstract Rosenthal M. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine in 2006: embracing the future. The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM) modified its mission and structure in 1997 to become an organization focused on medical rehabilitation research. Initially, this transformation accelerated an already diminishing membership, a weakened financial condition, and some level of dysfunction within the organizational structure. In recent years, with the advent of evidence-based practice and the expectation that empirical research is critical to the survival of clinical specialties such as rehabilitation medicine, ACRM has become re-energized. New initiatives have been spawned that have led to stabilization and an influx of new members, a measurable improvement in the quality of scientific presentations at, and participation in, the annual meetings, efforts directed toward increasing the visibility and involvement of ACRM on an international level, programming directed toward early career scientists, strong public policy advocacy, and renewed and expanded inter-organizational partnerships. In addition, the financial position of ACRM has improved markedly and prospects toward long-term fiscal health and growth are “the new reality.” ACRM has now moved significantly beyond the “survival” step of the Maslow hierarchy toward the goal of self-actualization. “It was the best of times … it was the worst of times.” Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities1 IT HAS BEEN A DISTINCT PRIVILEGE and a pleasure to serve the membership and the field of rehabilitation medicine as the 81st president of American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM) during the past year. The year 2006 has been marked by significant events that will have a positive impact on ACRM in the future. In this address, I reflect on the evolution of ACRM during the past 10 years, which has been the period during which the organization’s mission has changed to one focused on “promoting excellence in the science of rehabilitation medicine through interdisciplinary collaboration and cooperation in research.”2 As stated by Karen Hart, PhD, who was president of ACRM in 1997, “We will begin to build the structure to bring forth the new focus on clinically relevant research.”3(p1289) In addition, I also assess how the accomplishments in the past year have brought the organization to a more secure foundation as we progress up the Maslow hierarchy4 “beyond survival towards self-actualization.” For most of the 15 years since ACRM and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) formally separated in terms of their shared management and joint annual meeting structure, ACRM has experienced declining membership, has engaged in a multistage process of re-defining its mission, and has attempted to establish a base of fiscal stability. While these challenges of “survival” have been paramount, the past several years have witnessed substantial improvement in a number of these critical parameters that has enabled the organization to progress markedly on the path toward enhanced fiscal stability, firmer direction, and a more pronounced national presence in the rehabilitation community. At the center of this upward trend has been a deep commitment on the part of the leadership and membership to the mission of improving the science of rehabilitation research to benefit people with disabilities. “The Worst of Times”  A year ago, ACRM found itself in an extraordinarily challenging position, having been informed by AAPM&R that after 30 years of co-ownership of the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, it had decided to relinquish its 50% ownership, effective January 2009, and establish its own journal. This development led to negotiations between our 2 organizations that resulted in a “final” joint contract. This agreement is in effect until December 31, 2008, after which time ACRM will become the sole owner of Archives. The journal has enjoyed more than a decade of excellent fiscal returns and increasing stature in the international scientific community, evidenced in part by its Science Citation Index impact factor (now 1.73) and its manuscript submission rates. ACRM views Archives as an extremely important asset and appreciates the superb efforts of the editorial office, editorial board, and publisher as contributing factors in its success. Protecting this asset has been uppermost in the minds of ACRM leadership during this past year. On an unrelated note, but equally challenging, Deborah Wilkerson, the 2003 president of ACRM, died at the age of 57 while scuba diving with her daughter off the coast of Mexico in November 2005. This was a shock to so many of us who were friends, colleagues, and co-workers and caused us to reflect on her contributions to the ACRM and the field of rehabilitation. In concert with her family and close friends, ACRM initiated a memorial fund that resulted in the Deborah L. Wilkerson Early Career Award, which was presented for the first time at this 2006 Annual Meeting in Boston. A New Year—New Initiatives  As the year 2006 was ushered in, the organization had embarked on a number of initiatives to strengthen our internal operations and our service to the membership and the field of rehabilitation research. To strengthen communications with our members, we have provided the ACRM electronic newsletter, E-News!, on a weekly basis. The “Members Only” section of our website has been enhanced with the addition of slide presentations from our annual meeting. An Early Career Task Force was initiated, which assisted in developing the criteria to establish the Deborah L. Wilkerson Early Career Award and developed a new educational programming for the annual meeting and a mentoring network to assist early career rehabilitation research professionals. The International Task Force, newly established during the past year, embarked on several projects to determine what strategies might be most effective in enabling ACRM to participate fully in the global rehabilitation research community and to attract international participation in our annual meetings. A tentative plan has been developed to hold our first “international” meeting in Toronto in 2008 in conjunction with the Ontario Rehabilitation Research Network. The ACRM Policy and Legislation Committee, in concert with Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville PC, a legislative advocacy firm, provided leadership for an inter-organizational coalition of rehabilitation related professional and consumer-based organizations that has advocated for a stronger presence for rehabilitation research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), that is, a distinct NIH Institute for Rehabilitation Research, increased awareness of rehabilitation research at related institutes at the NIH, and better tracking of the NIH investment in disability and rehabilitation research. This effort is ongoing and has resulted in some important inroads in raising awareness among key officials at the NIH. Vital Signs  An organization’s health and well-being can be measured by a variety of key indices: in the case of ACRM, these “vital signs” are fairly easy to identify and are notable because they are currently pointing in the right direction. The organization’s membership, which had been declining over the past 10 years, has stabilized and has shown a modest increase. Our annual meeting, co-sponsored with the American Society of Neurorehabilitation, attracted 390 registrants, which was a 10% increase over last year and the highest attendance at the meeting in the past 5 years. The conference has become a leading venue for high-profile rehabilitation research scientists and a milieu for critical education offerings and networking opportunities for early career researchers. The Brain Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group has continued its stellar record of productivity, as it has developed new task forces and projects to assess the evidence base for a variety of issues and concerns in brain injury rehabilitation. Our fiscal reserves, as discussed earlier, have more than doubled due primarily to the new contract with Elsevier. In addition, we have raised sufficient funds to establish the Deborah L. Wilkerson Memorial Fund. We have added new committees and have more members who are involved actively in the affairs of the Congress. Archives, our most treasured asset, has continued to improve its ranking in the Science Citation Index and has experienced increases in manuscript submissions and pages published within the past year. Finally, our collaborations and co-sponsorships with other organizations in the matters of educational conferences and legislative advocacy continue to grow. These positive trends are very encouraging and are indicative of a bright future for our organization. While it is tempting to take personal credit for these notable achievements—there are many people to credit for them—without strong, effective leadership and management, an organization such as ours is unlikely to succeed. I have been fortunate to work with a very talented group of people—board members and committee chairs—who are strongly committed and deeply involved in rehabilitation research. In addition, the ACRM central office staff members have demonstrated that they are extremely hard-working, dedicated, and capable of achieving great feats under sometimes difficult demands of too much work, too many deadlines, and too few staff. The Future  As a psychologist, I have generally believed that “past behavior is the best indication of future behavior” and I would argue that that applies to organizations as well as to people. Therefore, I have presented what I hope is a convincing argument that the evidence in recent years shows that ACRM has made great strides in fulfilling the mission established 10 years ago, when the mission was changed to one reflecting a rehabilitation research-focused organization. I believe we have heeded the advice of past-president Martin Grabois, MD, who stated “Obviously, for us to succeed and move the organization and field forward, we need to deal with our membership issues, increase our financial resources, improve the quality and quantity of rehabilitation science, the funding for it, and the distribution of these findings to health care professionals and consumers.”5(p1098) Despite periods of limited financing and declining membership, ACRM has made substantial progress in overcoming these obstacles and has been, to a great extent, re-vitalized. Our goals and actions should reflect an organization that is secure in its mission, its fiscal stability, its leadership, its sense of purpose, and that is moving steadily toward self-actualization. More is needed, however, to maintain our momentum—more products and tangible membership benefits, more collaboration with like-minded organizations, more emphasis on advocacy and public policy initiatives, and more outreach to clinicians and consumers. The future has become increasingly brighter for the ACRM: let us embrace that future so we may achieve our highest aspirations to improve the quality of care and quality of life for people with disabilities, their families, and their communities. References  1. 1Dickens C. A tale of two cities. London: Chapman and Hall; 1859;. 2. 2American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Available at: http://www.acrm.org. Accessed December 19, 2006. 3. 3Hart KA. Rehabilitation research: the new focus of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1287–1289.
Full-Text PDF (356 KB)
|
CrossRef
4. 4Maslow A. A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev. 1943;50:370–396.
CrossRef
5. 5Grabois M. The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine: where do we go from here?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1097–1099. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (30 KB)
|
CrossRef
Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Corp, West Orange, NJ; and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey – New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ. Correspondence to Mitchell Rosenthal, PhD, Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Corp, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ 07052.
Supported by the Henry H. Kessler Foundation. No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author or upon any organization with which the author is associated. Reprints are not available from the author. PII: S0003-9993(07)00020-2 doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.01.012 © 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | |
|