Comparing Saphenous Nerve Conduction Study Techniques at the Knee and at the Ankle and Their Relationship to Body Mass Index
Abstract
Chiodo A, Spiegelberg T, Tong HC. Comparing saphenous nerve conduction study techniques at the knee and at the ankle and their relationship to body mass index.
Objective
To evaluate the saphenous sensory response by 2 methods and the correlation of obtaining responses bilaterally with body mass index (BMI).
Design
Twenty patients evaluated by 1 electromyographer and 10 patients evaluated by 2 blinded electromyographers.
Setting
University electromyography laboratory.
Participants
Thirty healthy adult volunteers.
Interventions
Saphenous sensory response with the recording electrode at the level of the medial malleolus, saphenous sensory response with the recording electrode at the level of the proximal tibia, and sural sensory response with the recording electrode posterior to the lateral malleolus.
Main Outcome Measures
Sensory-evoked amplitude and distal latency.
Results
The saphenous sensory response was obtained bilaterally at the knee in 77% of subjects, whereas it was obtained bilaterally at the ankle in only 50% of subjects (P<.05). BMI of greater than 25kg/m2 resulted in more difficulty in obtaining the saphenous sensory response at the ankle compared with the response at the knee (P<.05).
Conclusions
The saphenous sensory response at the knee is more consistently obtained than the saphenous sensory response at the ankle, and it is not affected by BMI.
aDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
bSpine Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
cElectromyography Laboratory, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
Reprint requests to Anthony Chiodo, MD, Dept of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Health System, 325 E Eisenhower Pkwy, 1st Fl, Ann Arbor, MI 48108
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.