Journal Home
Search for

Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages 321-327 (March 2007)


View previous. 12 of 37 View next.

The Development and Validity of the Salford Gait Tool: An Observation-Based Clinical Gait Assessment Tool

Brigitte Toro, PhDab, Christopher J. Nester, PhDbCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Pauline C. Farren, PhDab

Abstract 

Toro B, Nester CJ, Farren PC. The development and validity of the Salford Gait Tool: an observation-based clinical gait assessment tool.

Objectives

To develop the construct, content, and criterion validity of the Salford Gait Tool (SF-GT) and to evaluate agreement between gait observations using the SF-GT and kinematic gait data.

Design

Tool development and comparative evaluation.

Setting

University in the United Kingdom.

Participants

For designing construct and content validity, convenience samples of 10 children with hemiplegic, diplegic, and quadriplegic cerebral palsy (CP) and 152 physical therapy students and 4 physical therapists were recruited. For developing criterion validity, kinematic gait data of 13 gait clusters containing 56 children with hemiplegic, diplegic, and quadriplegic CP and 11 neurologically intact children was used. For clinical evaluation, a convenience sample of 23 pediatric physical therapists participated.

Interventions

We developed a sagittal plane observational gait assessment tool through a series of design, test, and redesign iterations. The tool’s grading system was calibrated using kinematic gait data of 13 gait clusters and was evaluated by comparing the agreement of gait observations using the SF-GT with kinematic gait data.

Main Outcome Measures

Criterion standard kinematic gait data.

Results

There was 58% mean agreement based on grading categories and 80% mean agreement based on degree estimations evaluated with the least significant difference method.

Conclusions

The new SF-GT has good concurrent criterion validity.

a Directorate of Physiotherapy, University of Salford, Salford, England

b Centre for Rehabilitation and Human Performance Research, University of Salford, Salford, England.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Christopher J. Nester, PhD, Centre for Rehabilitation and Human Performance Research, University of Salford, Salford, M6 6PU, England

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(06)01587-5

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.028


View previous. 12 of 37 View next.