Satisfaction With Quality of Life Poststroke: Effect of Sex Differences in Pain Response
Abstract
Bergés I-M, Ottenbacher KJ, Kuo Y-F, Smith PM, Smith D, Ostir GV. Satisfaction with quality of life poststroke: effect of sex differences in pain response.
Objective
To study the relationship between sex differences among men and women in the response to pain and the effect on satisfaction with quality of life (QOL) in poststroke patients approximately 90 days after discharge from inpatient medical rehabilitation.
Design
Cross-sectional design.
Setting
Community based.
Participants
The sample included 1724 patients (877 men, 847 women) aged 40 years and older with a history of stroke, according to information obtained from the IT HealthTrack database. The average age was 68.7 years; 79.3% were non-Hispanic white.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure
Satisfaction with QOL.
Results
Pain ratings for both the men and the women were significant and inversely associated with satisfaction with QOL after adjustments for possible confounding factors. However, among men with stroke, each 1-point increase in pain rating was associated with an 18% decreased odds of being satisfied with QOL (odds ratio [OR], .81; 95% confidence interval [CI], .77–.86). Conversely, among women with stroke, each 1-point increase in pain rating was associated with an 11% decreased odds of being satisfied with QOL (OR=.89; 95% CI, .84–.95).
Conclusions
Our data indicate that pain after stroke is significantly associated with reduced satisfaction with QOL, particularly among men. Increased awareness and treatment of pain may improve satisfaction with QOL. Our findings suggest that sex differences and pain response are clinically important factors in examining satisfaction with QOL in the poststroke population.
Reprint requests to Ivonne-Marie Bergés, PhD, UTMB, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX. 77555-0460
Supported by the National Institute on Aging (grant no. K02 AG019736), the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research (grant no. K01 HD046682), and the American Heart Association (grant no. 027045N).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.