Journal Home
Search for

Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages 181-186 (February 2007)


View previous. 10 of 28 View next.

Decreased Energy Cost and Improved Gait Pattern Using a New Orthosis in Persons With Long-Term Stroke

Dick H. Thijssen, MSc, PTa, Rebecca Paulusa, Caro J. van Uden, PhD, PTb, Jan G. Kooloos, PhDc, Maria T. Hopman, MD, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Abstract 

Thijssen DH, Paulus R, van Uden CJ, Kooloos JG, Hopman MT. Decreased energy cost and improved gait pattern using a new orthosis in persons with long-term stroke.

Objective

To measure energy cost and gait analysis in persons with stroke with and without a newly developed orthosis.

Design

Immediate and long-term (3wk) intervention (before-after trial).

Setting

University medical center.

Participants

Volunteer sample of 27 persons with long-term (range, 0.6–19y) hemiparetic stroke.

Intervention

Three-week familiarization to the new walking aid.

Main Outcome Measures

Energy cost (per distance walked), preferred walking speed (PWS), and step length. Energy cost was examined in all subjects while walking on a treadmill at 3 different velocities (PWS, PWS+30%, PWS−30%) during 3 different situations (without orthosis, with orthosis, after 3-wk orthosis familiarization). Spatiotemporal aspects of the gait pattern were examined using a 6-m instrumented walkway system.

Results

Using the orthosis immediately decreased energy cost in persons with stroke during walking at the PWS (P<.001) and significantly increased walking speed (P<.005) and step length (P<.001). After 3 weeks of familiarization to the orthosis, energy cost at the PWS and at PWS+30% showed further improvement in energy cost (P<.05).

Conclusions

The newly developed orthosis immediately decreases energy cost and improves walking speed and step length in persons with long-term stroke. After only 3 weeks of orthosis familiarization, energy cost shows additional improvement.

a Department of Physiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

b Department of Physiotherapy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

c Department of Anatomy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Maria T. Hopman, MD, PhD, Dept of Physiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein-Noord 21, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands

 Supported by Somas (St Anthonis, The Netherlands).

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(06)01522-X

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.11.014


View previous. 10 of 28 View next.