Volume 88, Issue 1 , Pages 94-98, January 2007
Assessments of Interrater Reliability and Internal Consistency of the Norwegian Version of the Berg Balance Scale
Abstract
Halsaa KE, Brovold T, Graver V, Sandvik L, Bergland A. Assessments of interrater reliability and internal consistency of the Norwegian version of the Berg Balance Scale.
Objective
To investigate the interrater reliability and the internal consistency of the Norwegian version of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) when applied to patients in a geriatric department.
Design
Interrater reliability was measured using the κ statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
Setting
Geriatric rehabilitation unit and geriatric day hospital in Norway.
Participants
Eighty-three patients were included; 25 were inpatients in a geriatric rehabilitation unit, whereas 58 were admitted to a geriatric day hospital.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure
The BBS.
Results
The κ values for the different BBS items varied from 0.83 to 1.00, and the ICC for the sum score of the BBS was .998 (95% confidence interval, .996−.999). The mean value of the BBS was 44.4. There was a negative significant relation between age and the sum score (r=−.36). The sum scores of BBS ranged from 12 to 56. The patients were able to perform the BBS without ceiling effect. The score values 3 and 4 were more frequently used than the score values 0, 1, and 2.
Conclusions
The Norwegian version of the BBS seems to have an excellent interrater reliability and high internal consistency when applied to patients in geriatric rehabilitation.
Key Words: Balance, Geriatrics, Outcome assessment (health care), Rehabilitation
Supported by the Norwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in Physiotherapy.No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(06)01424-9
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.016
© 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to erratum:
- Correction
Volume 88, Issue 1 , Pages 94-98, January 2007
