Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 12 , Pages 1605-1610 , December 2006

Measurement of Upper-Extremity Function Early After Stroke: Properties of the Action Research Arm Test

Presented in part to the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association, February 16–18, 2006, Kissimmee, FL.

  • Catherine E. Lang, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis MO
    • Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis MO
    • Department of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis MO
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Catherine E. Lang, PT, PhD, Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University, 4444 Forest Park Blvd, Campus Box 8502, St. Louis, MO 63108.
    • ,
  • Joanne M. Wagner, PT, PhD, ATC

      Affiliations

    • Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis MO
    • ,
  • Alexander W. Dromerick, MD

      Affiliations

    • Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis MO
    • Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis MO
    • Department of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis MO
    • National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC.
    • ,
  • Dorothy F. Edwards, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis MO
    • Department of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis MO

References 

  1. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483–492
  2. Research plan for the national center for medical rehabilitation research. Bethesda: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health; 1993;Publication No. 93-3509
  3. Carroll D. A quantitative test of upper extremity function. J Chronic Dis. 1965;18:479–491
  4. Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Chiang FM, Lin PH. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1998;27:107–113
  5. van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:14–19
  6. De Weerdt W, Harrison MA. Measuring recovery of arm-hand function in stroke patients: a comparison of the Brunnstrom-Fugl-Meyer test and the action research arm test. Physiother Can. 1985;37:65–70
  7. Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:404–411
  8. van der Lee JH, Roorda LD, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. Improving the action research arm test: a unidimensional hierarchical scale. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:646–653
  9. van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm Test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:110–113
  10. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke?. Stroke. 2000;31:2984–2988
  11. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke (Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:406–412
  12. Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1991. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;72:33–38
  13. Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864–870
  14. Zackowski KM, Dromerick AW, Sahrmann SA, Thach WT, Bastian AJ. How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits of people with chronic hemiparesis?. Brain. 2004;127:1035–1046
  15. Wagner JM, Lang CE, Sahrmann SA, et al. Relationships between sensorimotor impairments and reaching deficits in acute hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20:406–416
  16. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67:206–207
  17. Andrews AW, Thomas MW, Bohannon RW. Normative values for isometric muscle force measurements obtained with hand-held dynamometers. Phys Ther. 1996;76:248–259
  18. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Bastian AJ, et al. Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2005;166:126–136
  19. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27:S178–S189
  20. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:171–178
  21. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to clinical practice. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1993;
  22. Wallace D, Duncan PW, Lai SM. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the motor component of the functional independence measure in stroke: the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:922–928
  23. Croarkin E, Danoff J, Barnes C. Evidence-based rating of upper-extremity motor function tests used for people following a stroke. Phys Ther. 2004;84:62–74
  24. Schneider PAW. Comparison of motor limitations, use of hemiplegic upper extremity and disability among three groups of stroke patients [dissertation]. St Louis: Washington Univ; 1996;
  25. Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier R, Hahn MG, Sahrmann SA, Edwards DF. Relationships between upper-limb functional limitation and self-reported disability three months after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43:401–408
  26. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Diringer MN. Sensitivity to changes in disability after stroke: a comparison of four scales useful in clinical trials. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003;40:1–8
  27. van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, de Vet HC, Bouter LM. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2004;35:1410–1414
  28. Dorman PJ, Sandercock PA. Considerations in the design of clinical trials of neuroprotective therapy in acute stroke. Stroke. 1996;27:1507–1515
  29. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30:2369–2375
  30. Patten C, Lexell J, Brown HE. Weakness and strength training in persons with poststroke hemiplegia: rationale, method, and efficacy. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41:293-12
  31. Canning CG, Ada L, Adams R, O’Dwyer NJ. Loss of strength contributes more to physical disability after stroke than loss of dexterity. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:300–308
  32. Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the stroke impact scale. Stroke. 2002;33:1840–1844

 Supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant nos. NS41261, HD047669), the James S. McDonnell Foundation (grant no. 21002032), and the Foundation for Physical Therapy.No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(06)01333-5

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.09.003

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 12 , Pages 1605-1610 , December 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution