Journal Home
Search for

Volume 87, Issue 12, Pages 1559-1565 (December 2006)


View previous. 5 of 35 View next.

Respiratory Muscle Training in Restrictive Thoracic Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Stephan Budweiser, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Markus Moertl, MDa, Rudolf A. Jörres, PhDb, Wolfram Windisch, MDc, Frank Heinemann, MDa, Michael Pfeifer, MDad

Abstract 

Budweiser S, Moertl M, Jörres RA, Windisch W, Heinemann F, Pfeifer M. Respiratory muscle training in restrictive thoracic disease: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective

To investigate the effects of respiratory muscle training (RMT) in patients with restrictive thoracic disorders and intermittent noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV).

Design

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Home-based RMT, with assessment in a primary care pulmonary center.

Participants

Thirty patients with restrictive thoracic disorders; 28 patients completed the trial.

Intervention

Three months of RMT by isocapnic hyperpnea or sham training.

Main Outcome Measures

Respiratory muscle strength and endurance, lung function, exercise performance, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Results

After RMT, maximal inspiratory mouth pressure was increased (27.6%±36.5%, P=.013). In patients who could perform cycle ergometer testing (n=17), peak oxygen consumption (2.24±3.39mL·kg−1·min−1 vs −1.71±2.54mL·kg−1·min−1, P=.014) and maximal work rate (9.4±14.8W vs −5.1±10.8W, P=.043) increased relative to a control group. Similar differences occurred regarding changes of HRQOL (physical performance, 3.3±11.4 score vs −6.6±9.0 score; P=.012) and time of ventilator use (−0.6±1.2h/d vs 0.4±0.5h/d, P=.010). Lung volumes, 12-second maximum voluntary ventilation, 6-minute walking distance, and blood gases were unchanged.

Conclusions

In patients with restrictive thoracic disorders and NPPV, RMT improved inspiratory muscle strength. Exercise performance and HRQOL were improved when the 2 groups were compared. RMT was practicable and safe despite severe respiratory impairment. Further evaluation, including different training intensities and modalities, seems warranted.

a Center for Pneumology, Donaustauf Hospital, Donaustauf, Germany

b Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany

c Department of Pneumology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

d Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Stephan Budweiser, MD, Klinik Donaustauf, Ludwigstraße 68, D-93093 Donaustauf, Germany.

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(06)01323-2

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.08.340


View previous. 5 of 35 View next.