Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 12, Supplement , Pages 20-29 , December 2006

Patterns of Normal Human Brain Plasticity After Practice and Their Implications for Neurorehabilitation

  • Clare Kelly, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
  • ,
  • John J. Foxe, PhD

      Affiliations

    • The Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Program in Cognitive Neuroscience and Schizophrenia, Orangeburg, NY
    • Program in Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Hugh Garavan, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
    • The Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Program in Cognitive Neuroscience and Schizophrenia, Orangeburg, NY
    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Hugh Garavan, PhD, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

References 

  1. Holloway M. The mutable brain. Sci Am. 2003;289:78–85
  2. Buonomano DV, Merzenich MM. Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1998;21:149–186
  3. Karni A, Meyer G, Rey-Hipolito C, et al. The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:861–868
  4. Kolb B, Whishaw IQ. Brain plasticity and behavior. Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49:43–64
  5. Chollet F, Weiller C. Imaging recovery of function following brain injury. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994;4:226–230
  6. Robertson IH, Murre JM. Rehabilitation of brain damage: brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery. Psychol Bull. 1999;125:544–575
  7. Schallert T, Leasure JL, Kolb B. Experience-associated structural events, subependymal cellular proliferative activity, and functional recovery after injury to the central nervous system. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20:1513–1528
  8. Kelly AM, Garavan H. Human functional neuroimaging of brain changes associated with practice. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15:1089–1102
  9. Poldrack RA. Imaging brain plasticity: conceptual and methodological issues (—a theoretical review). Neuroimage. 2000;12:1–13
  10. Duncan J, Miller EK. Cognitive focus through adaptive neural coding in the primate prefrontal cortex. In:  Stuss DT,  Knight RT editor. Principles of frontal lobe function. Oxford: Oxford Univ Pr; 2002;p. 278–291
  11. Garavan H, Kelley D, Rosen A, Rao SM, Stein EA. Practice-related functional activation changes in a working memory task. Microsc Res Tech. 2000;51:54–63
  12. Jansma JM, Ramsey NF, Slagter HA, Kahn RS. Functional anatomical correlates of controlled and automatic processing. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001;13:730–743
  13. Sayala S, Sala JB, Courtney SM. Increased neural efficiency with repeated performance of a working memory task is information-type dependent. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16:609–617
  14. Hempel A, Giesel FL, Caraballo NM, Amann M, Meyer H, Wustenberg T. Plasticity of cortical activation related to working memory during training. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:745–747
  15. Beauchamp MH, Dagher A, Aston JA, Doyon J. Dynamic functional changes associated with cognitive skill learning of an adapted version of the Tower of London task. Neuroimage. 2003;20:1649–1660
  16. Andreasen NC, O’Leary DS, Cizadlo T, et al. II (PET studies of memory: novel versus practiced free recall of word lists). Neuroimage. 1995;2:296–305
  17. Andreasen NC, O’Leary DS, Arndt S, et al. I (PET studies of memory: novel and practiced free recall of complex narratives). Neuroimage. 1995;2:284–295
  18. Haier RJ, Siegel BV, MacLachlan A, Soderling E, Lottenberg S, Buchsbaum MS. Regional glucose metabolic changes after learning a complex visuospatial/motor task: a positron emission tomographic study. Brain Res. 1992;570:134–143
  19. Elbert T, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Rockstroh B, Taub E. Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science. 1995;270:305–307
  20. Hund-Georgiadis M, von Cramon DY. Motor-learning-related changes in piano players and non-musicians revealed by functional magnetic-resonance signals. Exp Brain Res. 1999;125:417–425
  21. Munte TF, Altenmuller E, Jancke L. The musician’s brain as a model of neuroplasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:473–478
  22. Karni A, Meyer G, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature. 1995;377:155–158
  23. Petersen SE, van Mier H, Fiez JA, Raichle ME. The effects of practice on the functional anatomy of task performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:853–860
  24. Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH. Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. Science. 1997;277:821–825
  25. Frutiger SA, Strother SC, Anderson JR, Sidtis JJ, Arnold JB, Rottenberg DA. Multivariate predictive relationship between kinematic and functional activation patterns in a PET study of visuomotor learning. Neuroimage. 2000;12:515–527
  26. Sakai K, Hikosaka O, Miyauchi S, Takino R, Sasaki Y, Putz B. Transition of brain activation from frontal to parietal areas in visuomotor sequence learning. J Neurosci. 1998;18:1827–1840
  27. Hikosaka O, Miyashita K, Miyachi S, Sakai K, Lu X. Differential roles of the frontal cortex, basal ganglia, and cerebellum in visuomotor sequence learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1998;70:137–149
  28. Hikosaka O, Nakahara H, Rand MK, et al. Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures [published erratum in: Trends Neurosci 1999;22: following 568]. Trends Neurosci. 1999;22:464–471
  29. Debaere F, Wenderoth N, Sunaert S, Van Hecke P, Swinnen SP. Changes in brain activation during the acquisition of a new bimanual coordination task. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42:855–867
  30. Seidler RD, Purushotham A, Kim SG, Ugurbil K, Willingham D, Ashe J. Cerebellum activation associated with performance change but not motor learning. Science. 2002;296:2043–2046
  31. Jueptner M, Stephan KM, Frith CD, Brooks DJ, Frackowiak RS, Passingham RE. Anatomy of motor learning. I (Frontal cortex and attention to action). J Neurophysiol. 1997;7:1313–1324
  32. Grafton ST, Hazeltine E, Ivry RB. Functional anatomy of sequence learning in normal humans. J Cogn Neurosci. 1995;7:497–510
  33. Doyon J, Owen AM, Petrides M, Sziklas V, Evans AC. Functional anatomy of visuomotor skill learning in human subjects examined with positron emission tomography. Eur J Neurosci. 1996;8:637–648
  34. Sturm W, Longoni F, Weis S, et al. Functional reorganisation in patients with right hemisphere stroke after training of alertness: a longitudinal PET and fMRI study in eight cases. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42:434–450
  35. Temple E, Deutsch GK, Poldrack RA, et al. Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:2860–2865
  36. Saur D, Lange R, Baumgaertner A, et al. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 6):1371–1384
  37. Raichle ME, Fiez JA, Videen TO, et al. Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. Cereb Cortex. 1994;4:8–26
  38. Poldrack RA, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Gabrieli JD. The neural basis of visual skill learning: an fMRI study of mirror reading. Cereb Cortex. 1998;8:1–10
  39. Poldrack RA, Gabrieli JD. Characterizing the neural mechanisms of skill learning and repetition priming: evidence from mirror reading. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 1):67–82
  40. Fletcher P, Buchel C, Josephs O, Friston K, Dolan R. Learning-related neuronal responses in prefrontal cortex studied with functional neuroimaging. Cereb Cortex. 1999;9:168–178
  41. Petersson KM, Elfgren C, Ingvar M. Dynamic changes in the functional anatomy of the human brain during recall of abstract designs related to practice. Neuropsychologia. 1999;37:567–587
  42. Pascual-Leone A, Torres F. Plasticity of the sensorimotor cortex representation of the reading finger in Braille readers. Brain. 1993;116(Pt 1):39–52
  43. Pantev C, Oostenveld R, Engelien A, Ross B, Roberts LE, Hoke M. Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians. Nature. 1998;392:811–814
  44. Haier RJ, Siegel BV, MacLachlan A, Soderling E. Regional glucose metabolic changes after learning a complex visuospatial/motor task: a positron emission tomographic study. Brain Res. 1992;570:134–143
  45. Landau SM, Schumacher EH, Garavan H, Druzgal TJ, D’Esposito M. A functional MRI study of the influence of practice on component processes of working memory. Neuroimage. 2004;22:211–221
  46. Asaad WF, Rainer G, Miller EK. Neural activity in the primate prefrontal cortex during associative learning. Neuron. 1998;21:1399–1407
  47. Chen LL, Wise SP. Neuronal activity in the supplementary eye field during acquisition of conditional oculomotor associations. J Neurophysiol. 1995;73:1101–1121
  48. Chen LL, Wise SP. Supplementary eye field contrasted with the frontal eye field during acquisition of conditional oculomotor associations. J Neurophysiol. 1995;73:1122–1134
  49. Rainer G, Miller EK. Effects of visual experience on the representation of objects in the prefrontal cortex. Neuron. 2000;27:179–189
  50. Buchel C, Coull JT, Friston KJ. The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. Science. 1999;283:1538–1541
  51. McIntosh AR, Rajah MN, Lobaugh NJ. Interactions of prefrontal cortex in relation to awareness in sensory learning. Science. 1999;284:1531–1533
  52. Ungerleider LG, Doyon J, Karni A. Imaging brain plasticity during motor skill learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2002;78:553–564
  53. Korman M, Raz N, Flash T, Karni A. Multiple shifts in the representation of a motor sequence during the acquisition of skilled performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:12492–12497
  54. Olesen PJ, Westerberg H, Klingberg T. Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:75–79
  55. Klingberg T, Forssberg H, Westerberg H. Training of working memory in children with ADHD. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002;24:781–791
  56. Klingberg T, Fernell E, Olesen PJ, et al. Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD—a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44:177–186
  57. Cools R, Robbins TW. Chemistry of the adaptive mind. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2004;362:2871–2888
  58. Egan MF, Goldberg TE, Kolachana BS, et al. Effect of COMT Val108/158 Met genotype on frontal lobe function and risk for schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:6917–6922
  59. Mattay VS, Goldberg TE, Fera F, et al. Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:6186–6191
  60. Diamond A, Briand L, Fossella J, Gehlbach L. Genetic and neurochemical modulation of prefrontal cognitive functions in children. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:125–132
  61. O’Connell MJ. Prediction of return to work following traumatic brain injury: intellectual, memory, and demographic variables. Rehabil Psychol. 2000;45:212–217
  62. Grafman J, Salazar A, Weingartner H, Vance S, Amin D. The relationship of brain-tissue loss volume and lesion location to cognitive deficit. J Neurosci. 1986;6:301–307
  63. Brooks N, McKinlay W, Symington C, Beattie A, Campsie L. Return to work within the first seven years of severe head injury. Brain Inj. 1987;1:5–19
  64. Posner MI, Rothbart MK. Influencing brain networks: implications for education. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9:99–103
  65. Rueda MR, Rothbart MK, McCandliss BD, Saccomanno L, Posner MI. Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:14931–14936
  66. Sanes JN, Donoghue JP. Plasticity and primary motor cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:393–415
  67. van Mier H, Tempel LW, Perlmutter JS, Raichle ME, Petersen SE. Changes in brain activity during motor learning measured with PET: effects of hand of performance and practice. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:2177–2199
  68. Kelly AM, Hester R, Foxe JJ, Shpaner M, Garavan H. Flexible cognitive control: effects of individual differences and brief practice on a complex cognitive task. Neuroimage. 2006;31:866–886
  69. Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL. A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:676–682
  70. Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, Menon V. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:253–258
  71. Greicius MD, Srivastava G, Reiss AL, Menon V. Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer’s disease from healthy aging: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:4637–4642
  72. Kennedy DP, Redcay E, Courchesne E. Failing to deactivate: resting functional abnormalities in autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:8275–8280
  73. Peterson BS, Skudlarski P, Anderson AW, et al. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of tic suppression in Tourette syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:326–333
  74. Ziemann U, Paulus W, Rothenberger A. Decreased motor inhibition in Tourette’s disorder: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:1277–1284
  75. Enright SJ, Beech AR. Reduced cognitive inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Br J Clin Psychol. 1993;32:67–74
  76. Rosenberg DR, Keshavan MS. Toward a neurodevelopmental model of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 1998;43:623–640
  77. Casey BJ, Castellanos FX, Giedd JN, et al. Implication of right frontostriatal circuitry in response inhibition and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36:374–383
  78. Pliszka SR, Liotti M, Woldorff MG. Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response-inhibition mechanism. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;48:238–246
  79. Curtis CE, Calkins ME, Grove WM, Feil KJ, Iacono WG. Saccadic disinhibition in patients with acute and remitted schizophrenia and their first-degree biological relatives. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:100–106
  80. Rubia K, Russell T, Bullmore ET, et al. An fMRI study of reduced left prefrontal activation in schizophrenia during normal inhibitory function. Schizophr Res. 2001;52:47–55
  81. Roche RA, Dockree PM, Garavan H, Foxe JJ, Robertson IH, O’Mara SM. EEG alpha power changes reflect response inhibition deficits after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2004;362:1–5
  82. Stuss DT, Gow CA. Frontal dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1992;5:272–282
  83. Craik FI, Anderson ND. Applying cognitive research to the problems of aging. In:  Koriat A,  Gopher D editor. Attention and performance XVII. Cambridge: MIT Pr; 1999;p. 583–615
  84. Verhaeghen P, Cerella J. Aging, executive control, and attention: a review of meta-analyses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26:849–857
  85. West RL. An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychol Bull. 1996;120:272–292
  86. Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:1596–1615
  87. Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Malec JF, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1681–1692
  88. Twamley EW, Jeste DV, Bellack AS. A review of cognitive training in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29:359–382
  89. Duncan J. Attention, intelligence and the frontal lobes. In:  Gazzaniga MS editors. The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Pr; 1995;p. 721–733
  90. Duncan J, Owen AM. Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:475–483
  91. Kane MJ, Engle RW. The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective. Psychol Bull Rev. 2002;9:637–671
  92. Engle RW, Kane MJ. Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In:  Ross B editors. The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol 44:New York: Academic Pr; 2004;p. 145–199
  93. Gray JR, Chabris CF, Braver TS. Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:316–322
  94. Cicerone KD, Giacino JT. Remediation of executive function deficits after traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 1992;2:12–22
  95. Cicerone KD. Remediation of ‘working attention’ in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2002;16:185–195
  96. Levine B, Robertson IH, Clare L, et al. Rehabilitation of executive functioning: an experimental-clinical validation of goal management training. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000;6:299–312
  97. Wexler BE, Anderson M, Fulbright RK, Gore JC. Preliminary evidence of improved verbal working memory performance and normalization of task-related frontal lobe activation in schizophrenia following cognitive exercises. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:1694–1697
  98. Paulesu E, Demonet JF, Fazio F, et al. Dyslexia: cultural diversity and biological unity. Science. 2001;291:2165–2167
  99. Rumsey JM, Andreason P, Zametkin AJ, et al. Failure to activate the left temporoparietal cortex in dyslexia (An oxygen 15 positron emission tomographic study). [published erratum in: Arch Neurol 1994;51:243] Arch Neurol. 1992;49:527–534
  100. Temple E. Brain mechanisms in normal and dyslexic readers. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002;12:178–183
  101. Cabeza R. Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. Psychol Aging. 2002;17:85–100
  102. Cabeza R, Anderson ND, Locantore JK, McIntosh AR. Aging gracefully: compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults. Neuroimage. 2002;17:1394–1402
  103. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Jonides J, Smith EE, et al. Age differences in the frontal lateralization of verbal and spatial working memory revealed by PET. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000;12:174–187
  104. Reuter-Lorenz P. New visions of the aging mind and brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002;6:394
  105. Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W. The perception of phantom limbs (The D. O. Hebb lecture). Brain. 1998;121(Pt 9):1603–1630
  106. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Phantom limbs and neural plasticity. Arch Neurol. 2000;57:317–320
  107. Elbert T, Candia V, Altenmuller E, et al. Alteration of digital representations in somatosensory cortex in focal hand dystonia. Neuroreport. 1998;9:3571–3575
  108. Pujol J, Roset-Llobet J, Rosines-Cubells D, et al. Brain cortical activation during guitar-induced hand dystonia studied by functional MRI. Neuroimage. 2000;12:257–267
  109. Behrmann M, Marotta J, Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, McKeeff TJ. Behavioral change and its neural correlates in visual agnosia after expertise training. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005;17:554–568
  110. Pascual-Leone A, Amedi A, Fregni F, Merabet LB. The plastic human brain cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:377–401

 Supported by Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience (National Education Authority’s Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions grant), U.S. Public Health Service (grant no. DA14100), General Clinical Research Centers (grant no. M01 RR00058), and National Institute of Mental Health (grant nos. MH63434, MH65350).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(06)01281-0

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.08.333

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 12, Supplement , Pages 20-29 , December 2006