Volume 87, Issue 12, Supplement , Pages 20-29, December 2006
Patterns of Normal Human Brain Plasticity After Practice and Their Implications for Neurorehabilitation
Abstract
Kelly C, Foxe JJ, Garavan H. Patterns of normal human brain plasticity after practice and their implications for neurorehabilitation.
Objectives
To illustrate how our knowledge about normal patterns of experience-induced plasticity can provide insights into the mechanisms of neurorehabilitation; to provide an overview of the practice-effects literature in order to simplify and amalgamate a large number of heterogeneous findings and identify typical patterns of practice effects and their determining factors; and to concentrate on the impact of practice on higher cognitive functions, such as working memory, and present some preliminary but promising behavioral data that show how practice on a complex cognitive task can benefit cognitive functioning more generally.
Data Sources
We performed a systematic search for peer-reviewed journal articles using computerized databases (PubMed, ISI Web of Science, PsycINFO).
Data Selection
Neuroimaging studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or positron-emission tomography (PET) to examine functional activation changes as a result of practice on sensory, motor, or cognitive tasks in normal (healthy) populations were included in the review. Further studies were identified that examined the effects of rehabilitative training on functional activations in clinical populations using fMRI or PET.
Data Extraction
Important characteristics of the selected studies were summarized in a systematic manner so to enable the extraction of specific factors impacting on the pattern of practice effects observed.
Data Synthesis
We identified a number of factors that impact on the patterns of practice effects observed and discuss how the insights gained from the study of healthy populations can by applied to rehabilitation of cognitive deficits in clinical populations.
Conclusions
Progress in our understanding of neurorehabilitative plasticity will be enabled by neuroimaging examinations of cognitive rehabilitation training grounded in a knowledge of normal (healthy) patterns of brain activation and practice-induced plasticity.
Key Words: Neuronal plasticity, Rehabilitation
Supported by Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience (National Education Authority’s Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions grant), U.S. Public Health Service (grant no. DA14100), General Clinical Research Centers (grant no. M01 RR00058), and National Institute of Mental Health (grant nos. MH63434, MH65350).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(06)01281-0
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.08.333
© 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 87, Issue 12, Supplement , Pages 20-29, December 2006
