Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 11 , Pages 1463-1470 , November 2006

Kinematic Analysis of Upper Limbs and Trunk Movement During Bilateral Movement After Stroke

  • Sylvie Messier, PhD, OT

      Affiliations

    • School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
    • Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Sylvie Messier, PhD, OT, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal, 6300 Darlington, Montreal, QC H3S 2J4, Canada
  • ,
  • Daniel Bourbonnais, PhD, OT

      Affiliations

    • School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
    • Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • ,
  • Johanne Desrosiers, PhD, OT

      Affiliations

    • Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
    • Research Centre on Aging, University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
  • ,
  • Yves Roy, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Physical and Sports Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

  • Image Result

    Experimental setup. (A) Subject’s initial position and (B) the 3 directions of the task. For the 45° directions, the plastic strips were turned until the stopper marking the 45° position was reached.

    Experimental setup. (A) Subject’s initial position and (B) the 3 directions of the task. For the 45° directions, the plastic strips were turned until the stopper marking the 45° position was reached. Abbreviations: −45NP/D, 45° nonparetic direction (for the subjects with hemiparesis) and 45° dominant direction (for the control subjects); +45P/ND, 45° paretic direction (for the subjects with hemiparesis) and 45° nondominant direction (for the control subjects). Adapted from Messier et al.20 Reprinted with permission.

  • Image Result
    The shoulder abduction and flexion provide an example of the measurement calculated as a function of the orientation of the proximal segment. The projection (a) of the arm on the frontal plane of the

    The shoulder abduction and flexion provide an example of the measurement calculated as a function of the orientation of the proximal segment. The projection (a) of the arm on the frontal plane of the trunk gives the abduction angle and that on the sagittal plane (b) gives the flexion.

  • Image Result
    Illustrations of between-groups results for the unilateral task in the (A) anterior direction, (B) 45° nonparetic direction, and (C) 45° paretic direction. Legend: —, paretic side for the subjects wit

    Illustrations of between-groups results for the unilateral task in the (A) anterior direction, (B) 45° nonparetic direction, and (C) 45° paretic direction. Legend: —, paretic side for the subjects with hemiparesis and nondominant side for the control subjects.

  • Image Result
    Illustrations of between-groups results for the bilateral task in the (A) anterior direction, (B) 45° nonparetic direction, and (C) 45° paretic direction. Legend: —, paretic side for the subjects with

    Illustrations of between-groups results for the bilateral task in the (A) anterior direction, (B) 45° nonparetic direction, and (C) 45° paretic direction. Legend: —, paretic side for the subjects with hemiparesis and nondominant side for the control subjects.

  • Image Result
    (A) Unilateral and (B) bilateral tasks: angular changes of the nonparetic upper limb for the subjects with hemiparesis and of the dominant upper limb for the control subjects and angular changes of th

    (A) Unilateral and (B) bilateral tasks: angular changes of the nonparetic upper limb for the subjects with hemiparesis and of the dominant upper limb for the control subjects and angular changes of the trunk of both groups for each direction. Abbreviations: D, dominant side (for the control subjects); 45NP/D, 45° nonparetic direction/dominant direction; 45P/ND, 45° paretic direction/nondominant direction; NP, nonparetic side (for the subjects with hemiparesis). *P=.02, P=.03, P=.04, §P=.01 (Kruskal-Wallis test).

 Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant no. 9810DRN-1241-58411), the Réseau provincial de recherche en adaptation-réadaptation (REPAR) (grant no. 1895), and the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec-REPAR (grant no. 22113-2078).No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(06)01267-6

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.07.273

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 11 , Pages 1463-1470 , November 2006