Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 11 , Pages 1496-1502, November 2006

Predicting Recovery of Upper-Body Dressing Ability After Stroke

  • Makoto Suzuki, MA, OT

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Makoto Suzuki, MA, OT, 1-30-37, Shukugawara, Tama-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 214-0021 Japan
  • ,
  • Mikayo Omori, OT

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
  • ,
  • Mayumi Hatakeyama, OT

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, St. Marianna University, Yokohama City Seibu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
  • ,
  • Sumio Yamada, PhD, PT

      Affiliations

    • School of Health Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
  • ,
  • Kazuhiko Matsushita, PhD, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedics, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
  • ,
  • Setsu Iijima, PhD, MD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Disability Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Bunkyo, Japan.

Abstract 

Suzuki M, Omori M, Hatakeyama M, Yamada S, Matsushita K, Iijima S. Predicting recovery of upper-body dressing ability after stroke.

Objective

To identify predictors of the recovery of independent dressing ability after stroke.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

Rehabilitation unit at a university hospital.

Participants

Sixty-three consecutive stroke patients were enrolled in the study. Twelve patients were not able to complete the study because they were discharged or transferred to another hospital before study completion.

Intervention

Fifty-one patients underwent and completed 15 days of dressing training based on the time-delay method, which included the 10 component actions of upper-body dressing and 4 cues given by therapists.

Main Outcome Measures

The dressing item of the FIM instrument, Brunnstrom motor recovery stages, presence or absence of deep and tactile sensation, Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test, Kohs block design test, body image test, Weintraub cancellation task, and presence or absence of the visual extinction phenomenon and the motor impersistence phenomenon.

Results

The FIM upper-body dressing item score and the cancellation task score at the start of training were significantly better in patients who achieved independence in dressing within 15 training days than in patients who did not (P<.05). The motor impersistence phenomenon was found less frequently among patients who achieved independence in upper-body dressing than among patients who did not (P<.05). However, logistic regression analysis showed that only the FIM score for upper-body dressing on the first day of training was a significant independent predictor of dressing ability at the end of training (odds ratio, 4.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.51–12.37). The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that a cutoff score of 3 would provide the best balance between sensitivity and specificity for the FIM upper-body dressing item. The positive predictive value of this cutoff score was .90, and the negative predictive value was .70.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that the FIM upper-body dressing score on the first day of dressing training is an independent predictor of recovery of upper-body dressing ability after stroke.

Key Words: Activities of daily living, Prognosis, Rehabilitation, Stroke

 

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(06)00872-0

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.07.267

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 11 , Pages 1496-1502, November 2006