Continuous Low-Level Heat Wrap Therapy for the Prevention and Early Phase Treatment of Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness of the Low Back: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Presented in part to the World Congress of Family Doctors, October 2004, Orlando, FL.
Abstract
Mayer JM, Mooney V, Matheson LN, Erasala GN, Verna JL, Udermann BE, Leggett S. Continuous low-level heat wrap therapy for the prevention and early phase treatment of delayed-onset muscle soreness of the low back: a randomized controlled trial.
Objective
To evaluate the effects of continuous low-level heat wrap therapy for the prevention and early phase treatment (ie, 0−48h postexercise) of delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) of the low back.
Design
Two prospective randomized controlled trials.
Setting
Outpatient medical facility.
Participants
Sixty-seven subjects asymptomatic of back pain and in good general health (mean age, 23.5±6.6y).
Interventions
Participants performed vigorous eccentric exercise to experimentally induce low back DOMS. Participants were assigned to 1 of 2 substudies (prevention and treatment) and randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups within each substudy: prevention study (heat wrap, n=17; control [nontarget muscle stretch], n=18) and treatment study (heat wrap, n=16; cold pack, n=16). Interventions were administered 4 hours before and 4 hours after exercise in the prevention study and between hours 18 to 42 postexercise in the treatment study.
Main Outcome Measures
To coincide with the expected occurrence of peak symptoms related to exercise-induced low back DOMS, hour 24 postexercise was considered primary. Pain intensity (prevention) and pain relief (treatment) were primary measures, and self-reported physical function and disability were secondary measures.
Results
In the prevention study, at hour 24 postexercise, pain intensity, disability, and deficits in self-reported physical function in subjects with the heat wrap were reduced by 47% (P<.001), 52.3% (P=.029), and 45% (P=.013), respectively, compared with the control group. At hour 24 in the treatment study, postexercise, pain relief with the heat wrap was 138% greater (P=.026) than with the cold pack; there were no differences between the groups in changes in self-reported physical function and disability.
Conclusions
In this small study, continuous low-level heat wrap therapy was of significant benefit in the prevention and early phase treatment of low back DOMS.
bProcter & Gamble Health Sciences Institute, Cincinnati, OH
cDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of Wisconsin, La Crosse, WI
Reprint requests to John M. Mayer, DC, PhD, U.S. Spine & Sport Foundation, 3444 Kearny Villa Rd, Ste 307, San Diego, CA 92123.
Supported by the Procter & Gamble Health Sciences Institute.
A commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a financial benefit upon the author or 1 or more of the authors. Mayer, Mooney, Matheson, Verna, and Leggett received grants from Procter & Gamble. Erasala is an employee of Procter & Gamble.
ABSTRACT