The Effect of Foot and Ankle Prosthetic Components on Braking and Propulsive Impulses During Transtibial Amputee Gait
Abstract
Zmitrewicz RJ, Neptune RR, Walden JG, Rogers WE, Bosker GW. The effect of foot and ankle prosthetic components on braking and propulsive impulses during transtibial amputee gait.
Objective
To assess the influence of energy storage and return (ESAR) prosthetic feet and multi-axis ankles on ground reaction forces and loading asymmetry between lower limbs in transtibial amputees.
Design
Subjects wore 2 different prosthetic feet with and without a multi-axis ankle and were analyzed using a blind repeated-measures multivariate analysis-of-variance design.
Setting
Gait analysis laboratory.
Participants
Fifteen healthy unilateral transtibial amputees (>55y) who had an amputation at least 1 year before testing because of vascular disorders.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
The anteroposterior ground reaction force impulse, peak ground reaction forces, and braking and propulsion impulse duration were analyzed as subjects walked at a self-selected speed while wearing each of the 4 foot-ankle prosthesis combinations. Statistical analyses were used to determine if there was a significant foot, ankle, or foot-ankle interaction effect on the outcome measures for each foot (P<.05).
Results
Amputees generated a significantly greater propulsive impulse with the residual leg when wearing a multi-axis ankle with the ESAR and non-ESAR foot, which improved the propulsive symmetry between the residual and intact legs. There was no prosthetic foot effect on these measures. There were no significant differences in the peak residual-leg braking or propulsive ground reaction forces or the impulse durations due to the prosthetic foot, ankle, or foot-ankle interactions, although an increase in the propulsive impulse duration approached significance (P=.062) with a multi-axis ankle.
Conclusions
These results suggest that amputee gait may improve with the prescription of multi-axis ankles that allow for greater propulsive impulses by the residual leg, which improve the loading symmetry between legs.
aDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, TX
bPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System/Audie L. Murphy Division, San Antonio, TX
cDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX
Reprint requests to Richard R. Neptune, PhD, Dept of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas, 1 University Station C2200, Austin, TX 78712
Supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no. BES-0346514) and the Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development (grant no. A27731-i).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.