Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 10 , Pages 1365-1370, October 2006

Reliability and Agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit Functional Capacity Evaluation Lifting Tests in Subjects With Low Back Pain

Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract 

Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Reliability and agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in subjects with low back pain.

Objective

To assess interrater reliability and agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in subjects with low back pain (LBP).

Design

Within-subjects design, with 2 repeated measurements.

Setting

Academic medical center in The Netherlands.

Participants

Twenty-four subjects (10 men, 14 women) with LBP.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

Five Ergo-Kit lifting tests (2 isometric, 3 dynamic) were assessed on 2 occasions (t1, t2), by 2 different raters (R1, R2). The interval between the test sessions was 3 days. Interrater reliability level was expressed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the level of agreement between raters with the standard error (SE) of measurement.

Results

ICCs means (reliability) of isometric and dynamic Ergo-Kit lifting tests ranged from .94 to .97, and SE of measurement values (agreement) ranged from 1.9 to 8.6kg.

Conclusions

There was good reliability and agreement between raters of the isometric and dynamic Ergo-Kit lifting tests in subjects with LBP, which supports the use of these tests to assess functional lifting capacity.

Key Words: Disability evaluation, Low back pain, Rehabilitation, Reliability and validity

 

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(06)00530-2

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.028

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 10 , Pages 1365-1370, October 2006