Journal Home
Search for

Volume 87, Issue 9, Pages 1235-1241 (September 2006)


View previous. 16 of 28 View next.

The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool: A Report of Validity and Reliability Testing

Presented in part to the Second International Ankle Symposium, October 15–16, 2004, Newark, DE (abstract appears in Br J Sports Med 2005;39:390) and the First World Conference of Sports Injury Prevention, June 23–25, 2005, Oslo, Norway (abstract appears in J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005;35:A20).

Claire E. Hiller, MAppSca, Kathryn M. Refshauge, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Anita C. Bundy, ScDb, Rob D. Herbert, PhDa, Sharon L. Kilbreath, PhDa

Abstract 

Hiller CE, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC, Herbert RD, Kilbreath SL. The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool: a report of validity and reliability testing.

Objective

To test the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), a 9-item 30-point scale, for measuring severity of functional ankle instability.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

General community.

Participants

Volunteer sample of 236 subjects.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Concurrent validity by comparison with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and a visual analog scale (VAS) of global perception of ankle instability by using the Spearman ρ. Construct validity and internal reliability with Rasch analysis using goodness-of-fit statistics for items and subjects, separation of subjects, correlation of items to the total scale, and a Cronbach α equivalent. Discrimination score for functional ankle instability by maximizing the Youden index and tested for sensitivity and specificity. Test-retest reliability by intraclass correlation coefficient, model 2,1 (ICC2,1).

Results

There were significant correlations between the CAIT and LEFS (ρ=.50, P<.01) and VAS (ρ=.76, P<.01). Construct validity and internal reliability were acceptable (α=.83; point measure correlation for all items, >0.5; item reliability index, .99). The threshold CAIT score was 27.5 (Youden index, 68.1); sensitivity was 82.9% and specificity was 74.7%. Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC2,1=.96).

Conclusions

CAIT is a simple, valid, and reliable tool to measure severity of functional ankle instability.

a School of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia

b School of Occupational and Leisure Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Kathryn M. Refshauge, PhD, School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, Sydney, NSW 1825, Australia

 Supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(06)00519-3

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.022


View previous. 16 of 28 View next.