« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 9
, Pages 1218-1222
, September 2006
Muscle Force and Gait Performance: Relationships After Spinal Cord Injury
References
- . Spinal cord injury. Facts and figures at a glance . J Spinal Cord Med . 2005;28:379–380
- . Recovery of ambulation in motor-incomplete tetraplegia . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 1997;78:1169–1172
- . Spinal cord injury (prognosis for ambulation based on sensory examination in patients who are initially motor complete) . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 1991;72:119–121
- . Spinal cord injury (prognosis for ambulation based on quadriceps recovery) . Paraplegia . 1992;30:762–767
- International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association . Spinal Cord . 1997;35:266–274
-
.
International classification of functioning, disability and health
. ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001;
- . Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 1994;75:67–72
- . Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete tetraplegia . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 1994;75:306–311
- . Sex-related differences of rehabilitation outcomes of spinal cord lesion patients . Clin Rehabil . 2004;18:709–713
- . Late neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2004;85:1811–1817
- . Outcomes of early surgical management versus late or no surgical intervention after acute spinal cord injury . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2004;85:1818–1825
- . Sparing of sensation to pin prick predicts recovery of a motor segment after injury to the spinal cord . J Bone Joint Surg Br . 1997;79:952–954
- . Prediction of ambulatory performance based on motor scores derived from standards of the American Spinal Injury Association . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 1994;75:756–760
- . Ambulatory capacity in spinal cord injury (significance of somatosensory evoked potentials and ASIA protocol in predicting outcome) . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 1997;78:39–43
- . Level walking and ambulatory capacity in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury (relationship with muscle strength) . Spinal Cord . 2004;42:156–162
- . Providing the clinical basis for new interventional therapies (refined diagnosis and assessment of recovery after spinal cord injury) . Spinal Cord . 2004;42:1–6
- Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI) (an international multicenter validity and reliability study) . Spinal Cord . 2000;38:234–243
- . Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II) (scale revision) . Spinal Cord . 2001;39:654–656
- . Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury (validity and reliability of 3 walking tests) . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2005;86:190–196
- . Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years (reference values and determinants) . Age Ageing . 1997;26:15–19
- Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury (a multicenter trial) . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2005;86:672–680
- . Recruitment of spinal motor pools during voluntary movements versus stepping after human spinal cord injury . J Neurotrauma . 2002;19:1217–1229
- . Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients . Ann Neurol . 1995;37:574–582
- . Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke (a randomised trial) . Lancet . 1999;354:191–196
- Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the Third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Randomized Controlled Trial . JAMA . 1997;277:1597–1604
- . Methylprednisolone for acute spinal cord injury (an inappropriate standard of care) . J Neurosurg Spine . 2000;93:1–7
Supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 320030-105324) and the International Institute for Paraplegia (grant no. P66).No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(06)00518-1
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.024
© 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 9
, Pages 1218-1222
, September 2006
