Journal Home
Search for

Volume 87, Issue 9, Pages 1223-1229 (September 2006)


View previous. 14 of 28 View next.

Measurement Precision and Efficiency of Multidimensional Computer Adaptive Testing of Physical Functioning Using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory

Stephen M. Haley, PhD, PTaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Pengsheng Ni, MD, MPHa, Larry H. Ludlow, PhDb, Maria A. Fragala-Pinkham, MS, PTc

Abstract 

Haley SM, Ni P, Ludlow LH, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory.

Objective

To compare the measurement efficiency and precision of a multidimensional computer adaptive testing (M-CAT) application to a unidimensional CAT (U-CAT) comparison using item bank data from 2 of the functional skills scales of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI).

Design

Using existing PEDI mobility and self-care item banks, we compared the stability of item calibrations and model fit between unidimensional and multidimensional Rasch models and compared the efficiency and precision of the U-CAT– and M-CAT–simulated assessments to a random draw of items.

Setting

Pediatric rehabilitation hospital and clinics.

Participants

Clinical and normative samples.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Not applicable.

Results

The M-CAT had greater levels of precision and efficiency than the separate mobility and self-care U-CAT versions when using a similar number of items for each PEDI subdomain. Equivalent estimation of mobility and self-care scores can be achieved with a 25% to 40% item reduction with the M-CAT compared with the U-CAT.

Conclusions

M-CAT applications appear to have both precision and efficiency advantages compared with separate U-CAT assessments when content subdomains have a high correlation. Practitioners may also realize interpretive advantages of reporting test score information for each subdomain when separate clinical inferences are desired.

a Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University, Boston, MA

b Educational Research, Measurement and Evaluation Department, Lynch School of Education, Boston College, Boston MA

c Research Center for Children with Special Health Care Needs, Franciscan Hospital for Children, Boston, MA

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Stephen M. Haley, PhD, PT, Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University, 53 Bay State Rd, Boston, MA 02215

 Supported by the National Institute for Child Health and Development, National Institutes of Health (independent scientist award no. K02 HD45354-01) and Genzyme Corporation.

A commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a financial benefit upon the author or 1 or more of the authors. Haley has a stock interest in CRE Care LLC, which distributes the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory products.

PII: S0003-9993(06)00470-9

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.018


View previous. 14 of 28 View next.