Journal Home
Search for

Volume 87, Issue 8, Pages 1021-1025 (August 2006)


View previous. 4 of 26 View next.

Usefulness of the Nursing Home Quality Measures and Quality Indicators for Assessing Skilled Nursing Facility Rehabilitation Outcomes

Burton Silverstein, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Patricia A. Findley, DrPH, MSWb, Rita K. Bode, PhDc

Abstract 

Silverstein B, Findley PA, Bode RK. Usefulness of the nursing home quality measures and quality indicators for assessing skilled nursing facility rehabilitation outcomes.

Objective

To examine the usefulness of the nursing home quality indicators and nursing home quality measures for differentiating among providers from a rehabilitation outcomes perspective.

Design

Retrospective.

Setting

Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) across the United States.

Participants

A total of 211 SNFs.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

All quality indicators, all quality measures except for CWLS01 (residents who lose too much weight), and a set of rehabilitation outcomes including residualized FIM motor gain, the percentage of patients discharged to community, and the percentage of patients reporting “quite a lot” or “completely” prepared to manage their care at discharge from SNF-based rehabilitation.

Results

No quality measures correlated with any rehabilitation outcomes. Residualized FIM motor gain did not correlate with any quality indicators or quality measures. Only 1 quality indicator—prevalence of daily use of restraints (QI 22)—correlated with the rehabilitation indicator community discharge percentage. The third rehabilitation indicator, prepared to manage care at discharge, correlated (negatively) only with QI 18 incidence of decrease in range of motion. Among the rehabilitation outcomes, residualized FIM motor gain correlated significantly with both community discharge percentage and prepared to manage care at discharge.

Conclusions

Patients and referrers choosing SNF-based medical rehabilitation need tools that differentiate among prospective providers from a rehabilitation outcomes perspective. Data in this study indicate that nursing home quality indicators and quality measures are inadequate for this purpose.

a HCR Manor Care, Toledo, OH

b School of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ

c Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Burton Silverstein, PhD, HCR Manor Care, 333 N Summit, 9th Fl, Toledo, OH 43604

 Supported in part by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health (K23 award no. HD40779).

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(06)00404-7

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.001


View previous. 4 of 26 View next.