Journal Home
Search for

Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages 909-913 (July 2006)


View previous. 7 of 29 View next.

Side Effects and Adverse Events Related to Intraligamentous Injection of Sclerosing Solutions (Prolotherapy) for Back and Neck Pain: A Survey of Practitioners

Simon Dagenais, DC, PhDabcCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Oladele Ogunseitan, MPH, PhDd, Scott Haldeman, DC, MD, PhDefg, James R. Wooley, DCc, Robert L. Newcomb, PhDh

Abstract 

Dagenais S, Ogunseitan O, Haldeman S, Wooley JR, Newcomb RL. Side effects and adverse events related to intraligamentous injection of sclerosing solutions (prolotherapy) for back and neck pain: a survey of practitioners.

Objective

To study the side effects and adverse events related to intraligamentous injection of sclerosing solutions (prolotherapy) for back and neck pain.

Design

Practitioner postal survey.

Setting

Postal survey of practitioners of prolotherapy for back and neck pain in the United States and Canada.

Participants

A sample of prolotherapy practitioners from 2 professional organizations were surveyed about their training and experience, use of specific treatment procedures, estimated prevalence of side effects, and adverse events related to prolotherapy for back and neck pain.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Prevalence of side effects and adverse events.

Results

Surveys were completed by 171 practitioners (response rate, 50%). Ninety-eight percent held medical degrees, and 83% were board certified in various disciplines. Respondents had a median of 10 years of experience, during which they had treated a median of 500 patients and given a median of 2000 treatments. Side effects with the highest median estimated prevalence were pain (70%), stiffness (25%), and bruising (5%). There were 472 reports of adverse events, including 69 that required hospitalization and 5 that resulted in permanent injury secondary to nerve injury. The vast majority (80%) were related to needle injuries such as spinal headache (n=164), pneumothorax (n=123), temporary systemic reactions (n=73), nerve damage (n=54), hemorrhage (n=27), nonsevere spinal cord insult (ie, meningitis, paralysis, spinal cord injury) (n=9), and disk injury (n=2).

Conclusions

Side effects related to prolotherapy for back and neck pain, such as temporary postinjection pain, stiffness, and bruising, are common and benign. Adverse events related to prolotherapy for back and neck pain are similar in nature to other widely used spinal injection procedures. Further study is needed to fully describe the adverse event profile of prolotherapy for back and neck pain.

a Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada

b Chalmers Research Group, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada

c CAM Research Institute, Irvine, CA

d Department of Environmental Health, Science, and Policy, University of California, Irvine, CA

e Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, CA

f Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA

g Research Division, Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA

h Statistical Consulting Center, University of California, Irvine, CA.

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Simon Dagenais, DC, PhD, CAM Research Institute, 27 Peters Canyon Rd, Irvine, CA 92606

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(06)00323-6

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.03.017


View previous. 7 of 29 View next.