Journal Home
Search for

Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages 799-805 (June 2006)


View previous. 12 of 29 View next.

Evaluation of the Errorless Learning Technique in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury

Presented in part to the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and American Society for Neurorehabilitation, October 23–26, 2003, Tucson, AZ.

Julie Landis, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Gerri Hanten, PhDb, Harvey S. Levin, PhDb, Xiaoqi Li, MSb, Linda Ewing-Cobbs, PhDc, Jackie Duron, MSb, Walter M. High Jr, PhDbd

Abstract 

Landis J, Hanten G, Levin HS, Li X, Ewing-Cobbs L, Duron J, High WM Jr. Evaluation of the errorless learning technique in children with traumatic brain injury.

Objective

To compare errorless learning with trial-and-error (T&E) learning of declarative facts in children with memory disorders secondary to traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Design

Retrospective within-subjects concurrent treatment design.

Setting

Participants’ school or home.

Participants

Thirty-four children, ages 6 to 18 years, with mild, moderate, or severe postacute TBI who met criteria for memory impairment.

Intervention

Conditions consisted of an errorless learning method and a T&E method. Within a session, half the items were taught with the errorless learning method and half with the T&E method. Each child received two 1-hour sessions a week for 7 weeks.

Main Outcome Measures

Relative effectiveness of errorless learning and T&E methods for (1) initial learning and (2) retention over time for learned items.

Results

There was an advantage for T&E on initial learning. In children with mild, but not moderate or severe TBI, 2-day retention was better with the errorless learning technique; 7-day retention was better with errorless learning in young children with mild TBI. Seventy-seven-day retention revealed an advantage for errorless learning in younger children with severe TBI.

Conclusions

Findings did not support errorless learning as a generalized intervention for learning difficulties after TBI or identify specific age- or injury-severity groups that benefited from this technique.

a Department of Educational Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX

b Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

c Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX

d Brain Injury Research Center, Texas Institute for Research and Rehabilitation, Houston, TX

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Julie Landis, PhD, Dept of Educational Psychology, University of Houston, 491 Farish Hall, Houston, TX 77204-5029

 Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133B990014-01).

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the author(s) or on any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(06)00165-1

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.017


View previous. 12 of 29 View next.