Volume 87, Issue 6 , Pages 799-805, June 2006
Evaluation of the Errorless Learning Technique in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury
Abstract
Landis J, Hanten G, Levin HS, Li X, Ewing-Cobbs L, Duron J, High WM Jr. Evaluation of the errorless learning technique in children with traumatic brain injury.
Objective
To compare errorless learning with trial-and-error (T&E) learning of declarative facts in children with memory disorders secondary to traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Design
Retrospective within-subjects concurrent treatment design.
Setting
Participants’ school or home.
Participants
Thirty-four children, ages 6 to 18 years, with mild, moderate, or severe postacute TBI who met criteria for memory impairment.
Intervention
Conditions consisted of an errorless learning method and a T&E method. Within a session, half the items were taught with the errorless learning method and half with the T&E method. Each child received two 1-hour sessions a week for 7 weeks.
Main Outcome Measures
Relative effectiveness of errorless learning and T&E methods for (1) initial learning and (2) retention over time for learned items.
Results
There was an advantage for T&E on initial learning. In children with mild, but not moderate or severe TBI, 2-day retention was better with the errorless learning technique; 7-day retention was better with errorless learning in young children with mild TBI. Seventy-seven-day retention revealed an advantage for errorless learning in younger children with severe TBI.
Conclusions
Findings did not support errorless learning as a generalized intervention for learning difficulties after TBI or identify specific age- or injury-severity groups that benefited from this technique.
Key Words: Brain injuries , Pediatrics , Rehabilitation
Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133B990014-01).No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the author(s) or on any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(06)00165-1
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.017
© 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 87, Issue 6 , Pages 799-805, June 2006
