Volume 87, Issue 5 , Pages 717-722, May 2006
Prosthetic Intervention Effects on Activity of Lower-Extremity Amputees
Abstract
Klute GK, Berge JS, Orendurff MS, Williams RM, Czerniecki JM. Prosthetic intervention effects on activity of lower-extremity amputees.
Objective
To investigate the effect of prosthetic interventions on the functional mobility of lower-extremity amputees.
Design
Crossover with repeated measures.
Setting
Household and community environment.
Participants
Twelve transtibial and 5 transfemoral amputees.
Interventions
For transtibial amputees, shock-absorbing versus rigid pylons. For transfemoral amputees, C-Leg versus Mauch SNS knees.
Main Outcome Measures
Daily activity level (step count) and duration (minutes of activity).
Results
Pylon type had no effect on the daily activity level or duration of transtibial amputees. Knee type had no effect on the daily activity level or duration of transfemoral amputees. Transtibial amputees were more active on weekdays (3079±1515 steps/d) than weekends (2386±1225 steps/d) (P=.007). In general, lower-extremity amputees perform numerous short-duration bouts of activity (1−2min) consisting of fewer than 17 steps/min, but activities of more than 15 minutes in duration were relatively rare (<1 per day).
Conclusions
Intervention had no effect on amputee activity level and duration. Higher weekday activity levels of transtibial amputees suggest their vocational activities are more demanding than recreational activities. The fitting, alignment, and design of prosthetic components should be optimized for 1 to 2 minute bouts of activity consisting of only a few dozen steps.
Key Words: Amputees , Artificial limbs , Gait , Lower extremity , Monitoring, ambulatory , Rehabilitation , Walking
Supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service (merit review nos. A2448R, A2770I).No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the author(s) or on any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(06)00154-7
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.007
© 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 87, Issue 5 , Pages 717-722, May 2006
