Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 5 , Pages 717-722, May 2006

Prosthetic Intervention Effects on Activity of Lower-Extremity Amputees

Presented in part to the International Society of Biomechanics, August 4, 2005, Cleveland, OH.

  • Glenn K. Klute, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterans Affairs Center of Excellence for Limb Loss Prevention and Prosthetic Engineering, Seattle, WA
    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Glenn K. Klute, PhD, VA Center of Excellence for Limb Loss Prevention and Prosthetic Engineering, MS 151, 1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108
  • ,
  • Jocelyn S. Berge, MSE

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterans Affairs Center of Excellence for Limb Loss Prevention and Prosthetic Engineering, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Michael S. Orendurff, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterans Affairs Center of Excellence for Limb Loss Prevention and Prosthetic Engineering, Seattle, WA
    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Rhonda M. Williams, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterans Affairs Center of Excellence for Limb Loss Prevention and Prosthetic Engineering, Seattle, WA
    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Joseph M. Czerniecki, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterans Affairs Center of Excellence for Limb Loss Prevention and Prosthetic Engineering, Seattle, WA
    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Abstract 

Klute GK, Berge JS, Orendurff MS, Williams RM, Czerniecki JM. Prosthetic intervention effects on activity of lower-extremity amputees.

Objective

To investigate the effect of prosthetic interventions on the functional mobility of lower-extremity amputees.

Design

Crossover with repeated measures.

Setting

Household and community environment.

Participants

Twelve transtibial and 5 transfemoral amputees.

Interventions

For transtibial amputees, shock-absorbing versus rigid pylons. For transfemoral amputees, C-Leg versus Mauch SNS knees.

Main Outcome Measures

Daily activity level (step count) and duration (minutes of activity).

Results

Pylon type had no effect on the daily activity level or duration of transtibial amputees. Knee type had no effect on the daily activity level or duration of transfemoral amputees. Transtibial amputees were more active on weekdays (3079±1515 steps/d) than weekends (2386±1225 steps/d) (P=.007). In general, lower-extremity amputees perform numerous short-duration bouts of activity (1−2min) consisting of fewer than 17 steps/min, but activities of more than 15 minutes in duration were relatively rare (<1 per day).

Conclusions

Intervention had no effect on amputee activity level and duration. Higher weekday activity levels of transtibial amputees suggest their vocational activities are more demanding than recreational activities. The fitting, alignment, and design of prosthetic components should be optimized for 1 to 2 minute bouts of activity consisting of only a few dozen steps.

Key Words:  Amputees , Artificial limbs , Gait , Lower extremity , Monitoring, ambulatory , Rehabilitation , Walking

 

 Supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service (merit review nos. A2448R, A2770I).No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the author(s) or on any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(06)00154-7

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.007

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 5 , Pages 717-722, May 2006