« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 5
, Pages 647-655
, May 2006
Dimensions of Disordered Attention in Traumatic Brain Injury: Further Validation of the Moss Attention Rating Scale
References
- . The Los Angeles Head Injury Survey (procedures and initial findings) . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 1988;69:425–431
- . The short term outcome of severe blunt head injury as reported by relatives of the injured persons . J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1981;44:527–533
- . Attention deficits after closed-head injury . J Clin Exp Neuropsychol . 1992;14:822–838
- . Sustained arousal and attention after traumatic brain injury . Neuropsychologia . 1995;33:797–813
-
.
The effects of visual distraction following traumatic brain injury
.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc
. 1998;4:126–136
- . Working memory impairments in traumatic brain injury (evidence from a dual-task paradigm) . Neuropsychologia . 1997;35:1341–1353
- . Anatomy of attentional networks . Anat Rec B New Anat . 2004;281:21–36
- The effects of methylphenidate on attention deficits after traumatic brain injury (a multi-dimensional randomized controlled trial) . Am J Phys Med Rehabil . 2004;83:401–420
- . The status of empirical support for treatment of attention deficits . Clin Neuropsychol . 2004;18:528–558
-
.
Attentional function after traumatic brain injury
(what’s impaired, what’s preserved and why?)
.
In:
Ponsford J
, Snow P
, Anderson V
editor.
International perspectives in traumatic brain injury
. Melbourne: Aust Acad Pr; 1998;p. 154–159
- . Use of the cognitive test for delirium in patients with traumatic brain injury . Psychosomatics . 2003;44(4):1–7
- Using early neuropsychological testing to predict long-term productivity outcome from traumatic brain injury . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2001;82:761–768
- . Frequency and duration of inattentive behavior after traumatic brain injury (effects of distraction, task and practice) . J Int Neuropsychol Soc . 2000;6:1–11
- . Awareness of errors in naturalistic action after traumatic brain injury . J Head Trauma Rehabil . 1998;13(5):16–28
-
.
Behavior rating scales in the assessment of disruptive behavior problems in childhood
.
In:
Shaffer D
, Lucas CP
, Richters JE
editor.
Diagnostic assessment in child and adolescent psychopathology
. New York: Guilford Pr; 1999;p. 91–126
- . The use of a rating scale of attentional behavior . Neuropsychol Rehabil . 1991;1:241–257
- . The Moss Attention Rating Scale (MARS) for traumatic brain injury (initial psychometric assessment) . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2003;84:268–276
-
.
Clinical neuropsychology of attention
. New York: Oxford Univ Pr; 1994;
- . Recovery versus retest effects in attention after closed head injury . J Clin Exp Neuropsychol . 1999;21:585–605
- . Analysis of the elements of attention (a neuropsychological approach) . Neuropsychol Rev . 1991;2:109–145
-
.
Disorders of attention
(a neuropsychological perspective)
.
In:
Lyon GR
, Krasnego NA
editor.
Attention, memory and executive function
. Baltimore: PH Brookes; 1996;p. 71–95
- . Empirical evaluation of the factorial structure of attention in adolescent psychiatric patients . J Clin Exp Neuropsychol . 1994;16:344–353
- . Introduction (the traumatic brain injury model systems of care) . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2003;84:151–160
- . Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness . Lancet . 1974;2:81–84
-
.
LISREL 8
(new statistical features)
. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International; 2000;
-
.
Rating scale analysis
(Rasch measurement)
. Chicago: Mesa Pr; 1982;
- . Evidence for the reliability of measures and the validity of measure interpretation (a Rasch measurement perspective) . J Appl Meas . 2001;2:281–311
-
.
Applying the Rasch model
(fundamental measurement in the human sciences)
. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001;
-
.
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
.
Structural Equation Modeling
. 1999;6(1):1–55
-
.
Bayesian model selection in structural equation models
.
In:
Bollen KA
, Long JS
editor.
Testing structural equation models
. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993;p. 163–180
- . Construct validity of concepts of attention in healthy controls and patients with CHI . Brain Cogn . 2001;47:446–460
- . The myth of testing construct validity using factor analysis or correlations with normal or mixed clinical populations (lessons from memory assessment) . J Int Neuropsychol Soc . 2003;9:947–953
Supported in part by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133A70033).No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(06)00099-2
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.01.016
© 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 5
, Pages 647-655
, May 2006
