Dimensions of Disordered Attention in Traumatic Brain Injury: Further Validation of the Moss Attention Rating Scale
Abstract
Hart T, Whyte J, Millis S, Bode R, Malec J, Richardson RN, Hammond F. Dimensions of disordered attention in traumatic brain injury: further validation of the Moss Attention Rating Scale.
Objectives
To investigate the factor structure of disordered attention in moderate to severe, acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to use factor analysis and item response theory to further validate and refine an observational rating scale of attention for clinical and research purposes.
Design
Multicenter inception cohort.
Setting
Inpatient rehabilitation units.
Participants
Patients with TBI (N=372) consecutively admitted to 8 Traumatic Brain Injury Model System centers within 2 weeks prior to observation, who consistently followed commands and who were on stable doses of all psychotropic medications for a 3-day rating period.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure
Participants were rated independently by treating occupational and physical therapists at an average of 1 month postinjury on the Moss Attention Rating Scale (MARS), a 45-item, Likert-type scale of attention-related behavior.
Results
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed 3 correlated factors of disordered attention, interpreted as restlessness/distractibility, initiation, and sustained/consistent attention. Item response (Rasch) analysis was used to eliminate redundant items and to fill gaps in item difficulty. The resulting MARS consists of 22 items that can produce 3 factor scores and a total score that covers the broad construct of disordered attention.
Conclusions
The factor-scored MARS has potential utility as a quantitative observational method with which to assess and study different dimensions of disordered attention in acute TBI, and to monitor change over time and treatment response within these dimensions.
aMoss Rehabilitation Research Institute and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
bWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
cRehabilitation Institute of Chicago and Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
eMississippi Methodist Rehabilitation Center, Jackson, MS
fCharlotte Institute of Rehabilitation, Charlotte, NC
Reprint requests to Tessa Hart, PhD, Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, 1200 W Tabor Rd, Philadelphia, PA 19141
Supported in part by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133A70033).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.