Volume 87, Issue 4 , Pages 541-545, April 2006
Gait Characteristics in Nondisabled Community-Residing Nonagenarians
Abstract
Kristhnamurthy M, Verghese J. Gait characteristics in nondisabled community-residing nonagenarians.
Objective
To determine gait performance in community-residing nonagenarians.
Design
Nested case-control study.
Setting
Community.
Participants
Thirty-one nondisabled nonagenarians (17 women) and 170 young-old controls (age range, 70−85y) participating in a longitudinal study.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Systematic clinical and quantitative gait assessments. We also examined the association of gait velocity with death over a 1-year period.
Results
Nonagenarian men had better performance on all quantitative gait parameters examined compared with women. Male sex (β=.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.95−38.89) and depressive symptoms (β=−.34; 95% CI, −6.73 to −0.04) were independently associated with gait velocity in multivariate linear regression models. The 6 hypertensive nonagenarians on angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors had faster gait velocity (median, 103.1cm/s) compared with the 8 hypertensive nonagenarians not on ACE inhibitors (median, 77.5cm/s; P=.029). Nonagenarians had worse quantitative gait parameters compared with the young-old controls, although the differences were less marked when subjects with clinically normal gaits in both groups were compared. Gait velocity did not predict survival over 1-year follow-up.
Conclusions
Gait characteristics in nondisabled community-residing nonagenarians are associated with male sex, depressive symptoms, and medications. The quantitative gait measures in this sample of nondisabled nonagenarians provide a yardstick to compare younger-age groups.
Key Words: Gait , Nonagenarians , Rehabilitation
Supported by the National Institutes on Aging (grant nos. AGO3949, RO1 AGO25119) and a Paul B. Beeson Career Development Award (grant no. K23 AG024848).No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(06)00034-7
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.01.006
© 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 87, Issue 4 , Pages 541-545, April 2006
