Volume 87, Issue 4 , Pages 524-528, April 2006
Role of Creatinine Clearance as a Screening Test in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
Abstract
Sepahpanah F, Burns SP, McKnight B, Yang CC. Role of creatinine clearance as a screening test in persons with spinal cord injury.
Objectives
To determine (1) the variability of annual creatinine clearance (CCr) testing for subjects with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and (2) whether decisions to change neurogenic bladder management are made based on CCr measurements.
Design
Retrospective chart review.
Setting
Inpatient Veterans Affairs SCI unit.
Participants
The medical records of 70 men were consecutively selected for review from among 664 veterans enrolled in the SCI clinic. All patient charts had to have at least 5 CCr tests performed within 10 years preceding the review.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Development of renal insufficiency and change in medical or bladder management of the patient, based on the results of the CCr test.
Results
For individual patients, the results of 24-hour CCr were highly variable from 1 evaluation to the next; the within-subject standard deviation (SD) for CCr was 25.9mL/min. The within-subject SD for serum creatinine was 0.12mg/dL. For all comparisons of repeatability, variability, and reliability, serum creatinine was superior to CCr. No medical management decisions were made based on the result of the 24-hour creatinine clearance. Renal ultrasound results and postvoid bladder residuals were the major factors in changing medical management with regard to renal function preservation.
Conclusions
The CCr test has little value as a screening measure for renal disease in SCI patients because of its variability in serial testing.
Key Words: Bladder, neurogenic , Creatinine , Kidney function tests , Rehabilitation , Reproducibility of results , Spinal cord injuries
Supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (grant no. R49/CE000197). The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(05)01473-5
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.032
© 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 87, Issue 4 , Pages 524-528, April 2006
