Effect of Different Sitting Postures on Lung Capacity, Expiratory Flow, and Lumbar Lordosis
Presented in part to the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America, June 19–22, 2004, Orlando, FL.
Abstract
Lin F, Parthasarathy S, Taylor SJ, Pucci D, Hendrix RW, Makhsous M. Effect of different sitting postures on lung capacity, expiratory flow, and lumbar lordosis.
Objective
To investigate the effect of sitting posture on lung capacity and expiratory flow (LC-EF) and lumbar lordosis.
Design
Repeated measures on 1 group of subjects in 4 postures.
Setting
Laboratory.
Participants
Seventy able-bodied volunteers.
Interventions
Postures were assumed randomly: normal, with full ischial support and flat lumbar support; slumped, with the pelvis positioned in the middle of seat while leaning against the backrest; against the back part of the seat without ischial support (WO-BPS), with partially removed ischial support and an enhanced lumbar support; and standing.
Main Outcome Measures
For LC-EF, forced vital capacity, maximum forced expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and peak expiratory flow; and lumbar lordosis.
Results
All LC-EF measures in standing were significantly superior to those in slumped and normal sitting, and 4 measures were significantly higher than in WO-BPS. In slumped sitting, LC-EF significantly decreased from that in normal sitting. WO-BPS sitting significantly increased 4 of the LC-EF measures from those in the normal sitting. Lumbar lordosis was the highest in standing and progressively decreased in WO-BPS, normal, and slumped sitting.
Conclusions
Slumped sitting significantly decreased LC-EF and lumbar lordosis. Because it increases the lumbar lordosis and promotes LC-EF, the WO-BPS posture may be a better seating option for people sitting for a prolonged time.
Reprint requests to Mohsen Makhsous, PhD, 645 N Michigan Ave, Ste 1100, Chicago, IL 60611
Supported by the Paralyzed Veterans Association (grant no. 2321-01), the National Institutes of Health (grant no. R24 Rehab Network), and the Falk Medical Trust.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.