Balance Self-Efficacy and Its Relevance to Physical Function and Perceived Health Status After Stroke
Presented, in part, to the Canadian Physiotherapy Association Congress, May 28, 2005, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Abstract
Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Robichaud-Ekstrand S, Hanley JA, Richards CL, Wood-Dauphinee S. Balance self-efficacy and its relevance to physical function and perceived health status after stroke.
Objectives
To estimate the level of balance self-efficacy among community-dwelling subjects with stroke and to determine the relative importance of balance self-efficacy compared with functional walking capacity in predicting physical function and perceived health status.
Design
Secondary analysis of baseline, postintervention, and 6-month follow-up data from a randomized trial.
Setting
General community.
Participants
Ninety-one subjects with a first or recurrent stroke, discharged from rehabilitation therapy with a residual walking deficit.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
The Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical function scale, and the EQ-5D visual analog scale of perceived health status.
Results
Average balance self-efficacy was 59 out of 100 points on the ABC scale (95% confidence interval, 55–64; n=89). After adjusting for age and sex, functional walking capacity explained 32% and 0% of the respective variability in physical function and perceived health status scores obtained 6 months later. After adjustment for age, sex, and functional walking capacity, balance self-efficacy explained 3% and 19% of variation in 6-month physical function and perceived health status scores, respectively.
Conclusions
Subjects living in the community after stroke experience impaired balance self-efficacy. Enhancing balance self-efficacy in addition to functional walking capacity may lead to greater improvement, primarily in perceived health status, but also in physical function, than the enhancement of functional walking capacity alone.
aDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC; Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
bSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC; Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
cFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC; Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
dFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
eRehabilitation Department, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
fInterdisciplinary Research Centre for Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Rehabilitation Institute of Quebec, Quebec City, QC, Canada
Correspondence to Nancy M. Salbach, PhD, Dept of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada. Reprints are not available from the author.
Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Quebec Réseau Provincial de Recherche en Adaptation-Réadaptation, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the Canadian Stroke Network.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.