Volume 87, Issue 3 , Pages 358-363, March 2006
Hemiplegic Gait After Stroke: Is Measurement of Maximum Speed Required?
Abstract
Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Hemiplegic gait after stroke: is measurement of maximum speed required?
Objectives
To study the relation between comfortable and maximum walking speed in stroke rehabilitation and to determine which parameters are predictive in this relation and increase the relations’ precision.
Design
One-year prospective cohort study. Longitudinal information was obtained for 10-m comfortable and maximum walking speeds, hemiplegic limb muscle strength, and balance. In addition, subjects’ ages and the type of rehabilitation they received were registered.
Setting
Stroke service facilities.
Participants
Eighty-one acute stroke patients.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure
Ten-meter maximum walking speed.
Results
We found a progressive improvement in walking speed and a mean systematic difference between comfortable and maximum walking speeds. An overall mean intraclass correlation coefficient for consistency of ρ equal to .96 and a within- and between-subject regression coefficient of 1.32 were demonstrated for the relation between comfortable and maximum walking speeds. None of the covariables included were statistically significant in the final linear regression prediction model.
Conclusions
Independent of time after onset of stroke, maximum walking speed can be predicted by comfortable walking speed with considerable accuracy. The precision of this estimation is not increased by considering patients’ age, hemiplegic muscle strength, balance, or therapeutic intervention.
Key Words: Gait , Rehabilitation , Stroke
Supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation (project no. 93.134) and ZONmw (grant no. 14.350004).No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(05)01385-7
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.007
© 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 87, Issue 3 , Pages 358-363, March 2006
