Journal Home
Search for

Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages 358-363 (March 2006)


View previous. 11 of 34 View next.

Hemiplegic Gait After Stroke: Is Measurement of Maximum Speed Required?

Boudewijn KollenaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Gert Kwakkel, PhDbc, Eline Lindeman, MD, PhDb

Accepted 1 November 2005.

Abstract 

Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Hemiplegic gait after stroke: is measurement of maximum speed required?

Objectives

To study the relation between comfortable and maximum walking speed in stroke rehabilitation and to determine which parameters are predictive in this relation and increase the relations’ precision.

Design

One-year prospective cohort study. Longitudinal information was obtained for 10-m comfortable and maximum walking speeds, hemiplegic limb muscle strength, and balance. In addition, subjects’ ages and the type of rehabilitation they received were registered.

Setting

Stroke service facilities.

Participants

Eighty-one acute stroke patients.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

Ten-meter maximum walking speed.

Results

We found a progressive improvement in walking speed and a mean systematic difference between comfortable and maximum walking speeds. An overall mean intraclass correlation coefficient for consistency of ρ equal to .96 and a within- and between-subject regression coefficient of 1.32 were demonstrated for the relation between comfortable and maximum walking speeds. None of the covariables included were statistically significant in the final linear regression prediction model.

Conclusions

Independent of time after onset of stroke, maximum walking speed can be predicted by comfortable walking speed with considerable accuracy. The precision of this estimation is not increased by considering patients’ age, hemiplegic muscle strength, balance, or therapeutic intervention.

Key Words Gait , Rehabilitation , Stroke

a Research Bureau, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle

b Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht

c Department of Rehabilitation VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Boudewijn J. Kollen, Research Bureau, Isala Klinieken, PO Box 10400, 8000 GK Zwolle, the Netherlands

 Supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation (project no. 93.134) and ZONmw (grant no. 14.350004).

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(05)01385-7

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.007


View previous. 11 of 34 View next.