Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 4 , Pages 474-481 , April 2006

Rapid Vascular Adaptations to Training and Detraining in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury

  • Dick H. Thijssen, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiology, Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement Sciences, the Netherlands
  • ,
  • Reinier Ellenkamp, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiology, Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement Sciences, the Netherlands
  • ,
  • Paul Smits, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, the Netherlands
  • ,
  • Maria T. Hopman, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiology, Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement Sciences, the Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Maria T. Hopman, MD, PhD, Dept of Physiology, RUNMC, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Reprints are not available from the author.

  • Image Result

    Results of plethysmography (N=9). Baseline (A) thigh and (B) forearm blood flow and baseline (C) thigh and (D) forearm vascular resistance. All parameters were analyzed using a 1-way ANOVA (dependent

    Results of plethysmography (N=9). Baseline (A) thigh and (B) forearm blood flow and baseline (C) thigh and (D) forearm vascular resistance. All parameters were analyzed using a 1-way ANOVA (dependent variable, time) with the P value reported in the figure. Values are mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Abbreviations: BF, blood flow; VR, vascular resistance. *Post hoc significant from 0 week.

  • Image Result
    Peak blood flow during the postocclusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) of the (A) femoral and (B) brachial artery (N=9). Parameters were analyzed using a 1-way ANOVA (dependent variable, time) with the P

    Peak blood flow during the postocclusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) of the (A) femoral and (B) brachial artery (N=9). Parameters were analyzed using a 1-way ANOVA (dependent variable, time) with the P value reported in the figure. Values are mean ± SEM. *Post hoc significant from 6 weeks.

  • Image Result
    Diameter change of the femoral artery (N=9). Diameter was analyzed using a 1-way ANOVA with the P value reported in the figure. Values are mean ± SEM. *Post hoc significant from 0 week. †Post hoc sign

    Diameter change of the femoral artery (N=9). Diameter was analyzed using a 1-way ANOVA with the P value reported in the figure. Values are mean ± SEM. *Post hoc significant from 0 week. Post hoc significant from 6 weeks.

  • Image Result
    Results of the FMD (N=9). Relative change of the FMD and corrected FMD (FMD/ΔMWSR) of the femoral (A+C) and brachial (B+D) artery are presented. Parameters were analyzed using a 1-way ANOVA (dependent

    Results of the FMD (N=9). Relative change of the FMD and corrected FMD (FMD/ΔMWSR) of the femoral (A+C) and brachial (B+D) artery are presented. Parameters were analyzed using a 1-way ANOVA (dependent variable, time) with the P value reported in the figure. Values are mean ± SEM. *Post hoc significant from 0 week. Post hoc significant from 6 weeks.

 Supported by the Johan van Drongelen Foundation.No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(05)01383-3

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.005

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 87, Issue 4 , Pages 474-481 , April 2006