| | Does Gynecologic Surgery Contribute to Low Back Problems in Later Life? An Analysis of the Women’s Health and Aging StudyPresented as a poster to the Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, October 8−9, 2004, Phoenix, AZ. Abstract Ericksen JJ, Bean JF, Kiely DK, Hicks GE, Leveille SG. Does gynecologic surgery contribute to low back problems in later life? An analysis of the Women’s Health and Aging Study. ObjectiveTo examine whether women with potential injuries to the abdominal and pelvic musculature from past gynecologic surgery are at higher risk for low back pain (LBP). DesignCross-sectional population-based study. SettingEastern region of the city and county of Baltimore, MD. ParticipantsDisabled women (N=1002) aged 65 and older, 448 of whom reported gynecologic surgery who were participants in the Women’s Health and Aging Study. InterventionsNot applicable. Main Outcome MeasuresLBP presence in the last year, LBP severity for the last month, and adjudicated lumbar diagnoses (disk disease, stenosis) were examined in relation to reports of surgical menopause or ovarian surgery adjusted for LBP risk factors. ResultsWomen with surgical menopause experienced more moderate LBP (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1−2.3) than women without surgical menopause. Women with ovarian surgery also experienced more moderate LBP than women without ovarian surgery, but this association was not statistically significant (AOR=1.39; 95% CI, 0.96–2.09). Gynecologic surgery was not associated with an increased likelihood of lumbar disk disease or stenosis. ConclusionsSurgical menopause may increase the risk of moderate LBP. Further research is needed to determine how gynecologic surgery might influence low back pathology. Abdominal and pelvic muscle rehabilitation after gynecologic surgery may provide protection from LBP later in life.
LOW BACK PAIN (LBP) IS A COMMON cause of disability and is associated with substantial health care costs among older people, particularly women.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Research and treatment focusing on anatomic pathology, triggered by the recognition of the herniated intervertebral disk, has not clarified the understanding and prevention of most LBP.6, 7 Lumbopelvic stability, provided by both passive joint characteristics and active muscle activity, protects the lower back from injury during loading conditions.8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Stability models acknowledge the importance of muscle function for spine stability while debating the stabilizing roles of specific muscle groups.9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 Muscle control disturbances in deep abdominal and pelvic floor muscles detected in some LBP populations prompted theories on “core” spine stability in LBP that focused on specific muscle activity.15, 21, 22 Other rigorous biomechanic research proposes that stability is derived from the activity of specific muscles acting locally, influencing single segments, combined with larger muscles acting regionally across several segments.12, 17, 23 Although these models debate the specific muscle contributions to lumbopelvic stability, they emphasize the importance of understanding abdominal and pelvic muscle function in LBP conditions.
This stability concept, emphasizing muscle function integrity, has yet to be assessed through population-based studies that could more appropriately determine a relation between injuries to the pelvic and abdominal muscles and LBP. Therefore, to better understand the association between abdominal muscle integrity and subsequent LBP, we analyzed data from the Women’s Health and Aging Study (WHAS).24 The WHAS contains extensive musculoskeletal pain data and confirmed data on spinal pathologies such as disk disease and spinal stenosis combined with data on gynecologic history. We used this large cohort study of older, community-dwelling, disabled women to test the hypothesis that injuries to the pelvic or abdominal muscles, incurred because of gynecologic surgery, put women at higher risk for developing LBP and spinal pathologies later in life.
Methods  The WHAS is a longitudinal, population-based study of disabled women aged 65 or older living in the eastern region of the city and county of Baltimore, MD. Participants were eligible for the study if they reported difficulty with daily tasks from 2 or more functional domains (basic self-care, upper-extremity ability, mobility, and higher-functioning tasks). Severe cognitive impairment, defined by scores below 18 on the Mini-Mental Status Examination,25 was an exclusion criterion. In-home screening was completed on 4137 women; 1409 were eligible, and 1002 agreed to participate in the study.24 Data for this analysis were derived from the comprehensive baseline assessment including an interview about health and sociodemographic information, nurse’s physical examination, physician’s questionnaire, and physical performance testing.24 Diagnoses of disk disease and spinal stenosis were derived from disease ascertainment algorithms by using information from participant interviews, physician’s surveys, nurse’s examinations, medical records, and radiographs.24 These algorithms showed acceptable reliability.24 Disk disease and spinal stenosis in the thoracic or lumbar spine only were included in the present study to define the outcome measures of disk pathology and spinal stenosis. The presence and severity of LBP were assessed by 2 questions: “During the past year, have you had pain in your lower back on most days for at least one month?” and “Please rate the average pain in your back during the past month.” Participants were shown a card with an 11-point numeric pain rating scale, with 0 denoting no pain and 10 indicating excruciating pain (as bad as you can imagine). Participants were classified as having moderate or severe LBP if they answered yes to the first question and rated the severity of recent or current pain in the moderate or severe categories. LBP severity was classified into categories of mild pain (no LBP reported or LBP rating 0−3), moderate pain (4−6), and severe pain (7−10). Of the 1002 women, 597 reported no LBP and were combined with the 49 women reporting only mild pain to form the mild reference category compared with 162 women reporting moderate pain and 193 reporting severe LBP. Surgical menopause was defined as present if a participant answered “surgery” when asked, “What was the reason your menstrual periods stopped?” Ovarian surgery was defined as a positive response to the question, “Did you ever have surgery on your ovaries?” The questionnaire did not query the participants for the type of hysterectomy performed. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by using weight (in kilograms) divided by height (in square meters), both measured during the initial home physical assessments. Diagnoses of osteoporosis and hip and knee arthritis were determined from adjudication algorithms as described for the spine pathology variables. Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics were calculated for study participants’ characteristics. Baseline percentages were weighted according to the sampling design to reflect the age distribution of the general population of older women in the East Baltimore area. The association between surgical history and LBP was studied by using unadjusted and multivariate adjusted logistic regression models. We examined gynecologic surgery both as a predictor of LBP reported in the last year (binary variable: 1= present, 0=absent) and spine pathology defined as disk disease or spinal stenosis from the adjudicated disease diagnoses (binary variable: 1=present, 0=absent). In addition, pain severity was classified by using a 3-level ordinal variable (mild or no pain, moderate pain, severe pain) so that we could study the influence of a reported history of surgical menopause or ovarian surgery (indications of gynecologic surgery) on moderate and severe pain (relative to the “mild or no pain” reference group) by using logistic regression (glogit optiona). We estimated the magnitude and degree of confidence by calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Potentially confounding variables included in the multivariate models were age, race, presence of knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA), osteoporosis, and BMI (grouped into tertiles). These variables have been linked to LBP in previous studies.26, 27, 28, 29 Information on treatment for osteoporosis with hormone replacement therapy, linked to LBP in some studies, was not obtained from participants.29
Results  The weighted prevalence of participant characteristics is shown in table 1. Of the 1002 women in this study, 42% reported LBP lasting 1 month or more in the prior year. Remarkably few women reported mild LBP (4.5%) compared with respondents reporting moderate (16.2%) and severe (20.7%) LBP in the prior month. Gynecologic surgery was common; nearly half (45.9%) reported a surgical menopause or ovarian surgery. Confirmed lumbar stenosis and disk disease were present in 2.8% and 7.8%, respectively. Logistic regression analyses results estimating the association of LBP reported in the prior year and LBP severity reported in the last month with gynecologic surgery are shown in table 2. The strength of the association diminished after multivariate adjustment; however, women who reported a surgical menopause were nearly 60% more likely to have moderate LBP compared with women who did not have a history of gynecologic surgery (adjusted OR [AOR]=1.59; 95% CI, 1.1−2.3). Ovarian surgery was associated with moderate pain in the past month (AOR=1.39; 95% CI, 0.96−2.00) after multivariate adjustment, but this association was not statistically significant. A history of either form of gynecologic surgery was not significantly associated with severe LBP. Overall, the history of either surgical menopause or ovarian surgery (ie, any gynecologic surgery) was significantly associated with moderate LBP (AOR=1.44; 95% CI, 1.01–2.07). Neither surgical menopause nor ovarian surgery was significantly associated with spine pathology manifested as lumbar stenosis or disk pathology in the lumbar and thoracic region (fig 1). In an additional analysis, obstetric history, derived from questions about living children, was not significantly associated with the outcomes of LBP in the last year, moderate or severe LBP in the past month, and spine pathology (data not shown).
Discussion  The results of this study suggest that gynecologic surgery resulting in menopause is associated with self-reported moderate severity LBP in late life among women. The relation was independent of other factors, available in the database, previously linked to LBP such as hip and knee arthritis, osteoporosis, and obesity.26, 27, 28 Prior gynecologic surgery was not associated with an increased risk for severe LBP in the last month or thoracolumbar spine pathology such as disk disease or stenosis. Biomechanic models have proposed that stability from neuromuscular control mechanisms is important for protecting the lower spine from acute and chronic injury.9, 20, 30, 31 Within the biomechanic and rehabilitation literature, pelvic floor and abdominal muscle dysfunctions have been theorized as important precipitating factors leading to LBP.16, 21, 22, 32 Our large population-based study suggests a link between prior gynecologic surgery and subsequent LBP. Altered abdominal or pelvic floor muscle function after surgery could precipitate LBP. For the purposes of this investigation, we chose to evaluate gynecologic surgery that would not typically involve severing of muscle or nerve structures but rather stretching or ischemic injury during surgical retraction or compression. Such injuries may precipitate biomechanic dysfunction with reduced core stabilizing force production, as well as secondary muscle deconditioning from pain inhibition during the perioperative period. Spontaneous recovery of normal biomechanic muscle function after surgery may not be automatic. The observation that deep spine muscle atrophy was present long after symptom resolution in acute LBP patients, together with muscle fiber–type changes years after lumbar surgery, support the idea that spontaneous muscle recovery after surgical and nonsurgical muscle injury is not automatic.33, 34, 35 We are not aware of similar studies assessing recovery of biomechanic or neurophysiologic function after abdominal or gynecologic surgery. Regardless of the potential mechanisms, our findings suggest that injury to, or deconditioning of, these muscle groups may occur during gynecologic surgery and predispose these women to core muscle dysfunction and LBP later in life. Other reports of LBP and muscle control loss after pelvic surgery and childbirth support this hypothesis. Biomechanic effects manifested initially as incontinence and weakened pelvic floor muscle contractions were reported in 25% of new mothers.36 An Australian survey37 of health problems after childbirth described persistent early back pain in half of the total (n=1193) respondents. Primiparous women reported more back pain in the first 8 weeks postpartum than multiparous women. However, multiparous women described continued LBP and urinary problems, whereas primiparous women described declining LBP and urinary dysfunction over time.37 Middle-aged women with urinary incontinence after Burch colposuspension surgery, involving abdominal incision to access the bladder and urethra, reported a higher incidence of LBP than women with incontinence who did not report a surgical history (66% vs 38%).38 A retrospective study of 1760 middle-aged women (ages 38−64y) reported an association between LBP and hysterectomy in the older group (50−64y) and an association between LBP and abortion, dilatation and curettage, and childbirth.39 Higher numbers of live births in the older group and abortions in the younger group were associated with LBP after controlling for other risk factors. Rehabilitation focus on abdominal and pelvic muscles, potentially injured in gynecologic surgery, has shown some efficacy in some LBP populations. Specific activation of transversus abdominis in the low abdomen and the pelvic floor muscles showed long-term benefits in both pain intensity and the Oswestry disability instrument at 30-month follow-up compared with traditional physiotherapy (PT) approaches in spondylitic LBP subjects.40 Reduced pelvic pain was shown in postpartum women after pelvic girdle stabilization exercises focusing on the deep local muscles compared with controls given PT with strengthening exercises not focusing on the specific “core” muscles.41 Although not linking specific muscle injury etiologies to LBP conditions, the focus of these studies on the deep musculature rather than conventional PT interventions further confirms that specific muscle groups, at risk for altered function after gynecologic surgery, play an important role in LBP. These outcome study observations together with our findings of the association between moderate severity LBP and surgical menopause support the belief that gynecologic and obstetric events might compromise protective abdominal and pelvic musculature with both immediate and long-term consequences. The treatment outcomes described previously, focusing on retraining of muscles deep in the abdomen and pelvis, support the concept that muscle function is important to understand both the etiology and treatment of LBP. It is important to note that prior gynecologic surgery was not associated with severe LBP in our analyses. Generally, it is acknowledged that multiple factors, including psychosocial influences, may contribute to the presence of LBP.42 Severe LBP may reflect the presence of overwhelming ongoing pathology or more recent injury; thus, a remote injury to abdominal or pelvic musculature may play a reduced role. Additionally, the WHAS cohort represents a population of disabled women with multiple comorbidities. Thus, many factors that contribute to disability (a common manifestation of severe LBP) may reduce any risk that prior surgery could impart. A study involving a healthier cohort of older women would allow a clearer understanding of the relation between prior surgery and subsequent LBP. The hypothesis that gynecologic surgery would increase the likelihood of the specific spine pathologies spinal stenosis and disk disease was not supported by the results of this analysis. Several limitations to the dataset could account for the lack of association. We may not have the power to detect the strength of the association using this relatively small dataset. We do not have information regarding the surgical type and time since surgery, and the diagnoses of stenosis and disk disease, done by record review and not full population radiographic screening, may not reflect the true incidence of these pathologies in older women. Other potential limitations of our investigation exist. The dataset did not allow appropriate examination of the relation between obstetric events and the outcome variables of LBP and spine pathology. True parity of the participants was not available. The influence of the number of live births and birth methods as potential risk factors for LBP or spine pathology warrant further investigation. Surgical descriptors for surgical menopause and ovarian surgery were not recorded in the WHAS database, and the temporal relation between surgery and the onset of spine conditions has not been investigated. The potentially cumulative role of abdominal surgery such as cholecystectomy and other pelvic surgeries (eg, bladder surgery) was not examined; the physical examination data did not include surgical scar observations. We do not know whether abdominal surgeries in men would predispose them to back pain or spine pathology later in life.
Conclusions  Despite the limitations previously mentioned, our findings suggest that a potential injury to the pelvic and lower abdominal musculature, surgical menopause in this case, puts women at increased risk for LBP later in life. Women reporting a surgical menopause described moderate LBP more often than women with no history of gynecologic surgery. Biomechanic and neurophysiologic research is posing mechanisms for how the deep pelvic and abdominal muscles provide lumbopelvic stability. There is growing rehabilitation focus for activating and strengthening these muscles not only for incontinence but for LBP treatment as well.22, 41, 43, 44, 45, 46 Rehabilitation of muscles potentially injured with gynecologic surgery is reasonable in hopes of avoiding the deleterious effects that may predispose women to LBP as they age. Our observation of the increased likelihood of having LBP years after gynecologic surgery suggests that preventive rehabilitation efforts after surgery should focus on restoring normal neurophysiologic and biomechanic function to the muscles of the lower abdomen and pelvis. Further investigation of the role of obstetric and gynecologic events on LBP and spine pathology is warranted to determine whether these “routine” life events may lead to hazardous biomechanic and neuromuscular changes in important protective muscle systems. Supplier
References  1.
1
Lavsky-Shulan M
, Wallace RB
, Kohout FJ
, Lemke JH
, Morris MC
, Smith IM
.
Prevalence and functional correlates of low back pain in the elderly
(the Iowa 65+ Rural Health Study)
.
J Am Geriatr Soc
. 1985;33:23–28
.
MEDLINE 2.
2
Leveille SG
, Bean J
, Bandeen-Roche K
, Jones R
, Hochberg M
, Guralnik JM
.
Musculoskeletal pain and risk for falls in older disabled women living in the community
.
J Am Geriatr Soc
. 2002;50:671–678
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
3.
3
Leveille SG
, Guralnik JM
, Hochberg M
, et al.
Low back pain and disability in older women
(independent association with difficulty but not inability to perform daily activities)
.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
. 1999;54:M487–M493
.
MEDLINE 4.
4
Mapel DW
, Shainline M
, Paez K
, Gunter M
.
Hospital, pharmacy, and outpatient costs for osteoarthritis and chronic back pain
.
J Rheumatol
. 2004;31:573–583
.
5.
5
Luo X
, Pietrobon R
, Sun SX
, Liu GG
, Hey L
.
Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States
.
Spine
. 2004;29:79–86
.
CrossRef
6.
6
Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders
.
Spine
. 1987;12(7 Suppl):1–59
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
7.
7
Mixter WJ
, Barr JS
.
Rupture of the intervertebral disk with involvement of the spinal canal
.
N Engl J Med
. 1934;211:210–215
.
8.
8
Lee D
.
Principles of the integrated model of function and its application to the lumbopelvic-hip region
.
In:
Lee D
editors.
The pelvic girdle
(an approach to the examination and treatment of the lumbopelvic-hip region)
. 3rd ed.. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2004;p. 41–54
.
9.
9
Snijders CJ
, Vleeming A
, Stoeckart R
.
Transfer of lumbosacral load to the iliac bones and legs. Part 1: Biomechanics of self bracing of the sacroiliac joints and its significance for treatment and exercise
.
Clin Biomech
. 1993;8:285–294
.
10.
10
Vleeming A
, Volkers AC
, Snijders CJ
, Stoeckart R
.
Relation between form and function in the sacroiliac joint. 2: Biomechanical aspects
.
Spine
. 1990;15:133–136
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
11.
11
Vleeming A
, Snijders CJ
, Stoeckart R
, Mens JM
.
The role of the sacroiliac joints in coupling between spine, pelvis, legs and arms
.
In:
Vleeming A
, Mooney V
, Dorman T
, Snijders C
, Stoeckart R
editor.
Movement, stability & low back pain
. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997;p. 53–71
.
12.
12
McGill SM
, Grenier S
, Kavcic N
, Cholewicki J
.
Coordination of muscle activity to assure stability of the lumbar spine
.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol
. 2003;13:353–359
.
Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (255 KB)
|
CrossRef
13.
13
Cholewicki J
, Panjabi MM
, Khachatryan A
.
Stabilizing function of trunk flexor-extensor muscles around a neutral spine posture
.
Spine
. 1997;22:2207–2212
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
14.
14
Granata KP
, Marras WS
.
Cost-benefit of muscle cocontraction in protecting against spinal instability
.
Spine
. 2000;25:1398–1404
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
15.
15
Hodges PW
.
Is there a role for transversus abdominis in lumbo-pelvic stability?
.
Man Ther
. 1999;4:74–86
.
|
CrossRef
16.
16
Hodges PW
, Moseley GL
.
Pain and motor control of the lumbopelvic region
(effect and possible mechanisms)
.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol
. 2003;13:361–370
.
Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (140 KB)
|
CrossRef
17.
17
Kavcic N
, Grenier S
, McGill SM
.
Determining the stabilizing role of individual torso muscles during rehabilitation exercises
.
Spine
. 2004;29:1254–1265
.
CrossRef
18.
18
Panjabi M
.
The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement
.
J Spinal Disord
. 1992;5:383–389
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
19.
19
Panjabi M
.
The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis
.
J Spinal Disord
. 1992;5:390–396
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
20.
20
Panjabi M
.
Clinical spinal instability and low back pain
.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol
. 2003;13:371–379
.
Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (320 KB)
|
CrossRef
21.
21
Hodges PW
.
Changes in motor planning of feedforward postural responses of the trunk muscles in low back pain
.
Exp Brain Res
. 2001;141:261–266
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
22.
22
O’Sullivan PB
, Beales DJ
, Beetham JA
, et al.
Altered motor control strategies in subjects with sacroiliac joint pain during the active straight-leg-raise test
.
Spine
. 2002;27:E1–E8
.
CrossRef
23.
23
Bergmark A
.
Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering
.
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl
. 1989;230:1–54
.
MEDLINE 24.
24
Guralnik JM
, Fried LP
, Simonsick EM
, Kasper JD
, Lafferty ME
.
The Women’s Health and Aging Study
(health and social characteristics of older women with disability)
. Bethesda: National Institute on Aging; 1995;
.
25.
25
Makela M
, Heliovaara M
, Sievers K
, Knekt P
, Maatela J
, Aromaa A
.
Musculoskeletal disorders as determinants of disability in Finns aged 30 years or more
.
J Clin Epidemiol
. 1993;46:549–559
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
26.
26
Hassett G
, Hart DJ
, Manek NJ
, Doyle DV
, Spector TD
.
Risk factors for progression of lumbar spine disc degeneration
(the Chingford Study)
.
Arthritis Rheum
. 2003;48:3112–3117
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
27.
27
Hartvigsen J
, Christensen K
, Frederiksen H
, Pedersen HC
.
Genetic and environmental contributions to back pain in old age
(a study of 2,108 Danish twins aged 70 and older)
.
Spine
. 2004;29:897–901
.
CrossRef
28.
28
Andersen RE
, Crespo CJ
, Bartlett SJ
, Bathon JM
, Fontaine KR
.
Relationship between body weight gain and significant knee, hip, and back pain in older Americans
.
Obes Res
. 2003;11:1159–1162
.
MEDLINE 29.
29
Brynhildsen JO
, Bjors E
, Skarsgard C
, Hammar ML
.
Is hormone replacement therapy a risk factor for low back pain among postmenopausal women?
.
Spine
. 1998;23:809–813
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
30.
30
Vleeming A
, Volkers AC
, Snijders CJ
, Stoeckart R
.
Relation between form and function in the sacroiliac joint. 2: Biomechanical aspects
.
Spine
. 1990;15:133–136
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
31.
31
Hodges P
, Kaigle Holm A
, Holm S
, et al.
Intervertebral stiffness of the spine is increased by evoked contraction of transversus abdominis and the diaphragm
(in vivo porcine studies)
.
Spine
. 2003;28:2594–2601
.
CrossRef
32.
32
van Dieen JH
, Selen LP
, Cholewicki J
.
Trunk muscle activation in low-back pain patients, an analysis of the literature
.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol
. 2003;13:333–351
.
Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (214 KB)
|
CrossRef
33.
33
Hides JA
, Richardson CA
, Jull GA
.
Multifidus muscle recovery is not automatic after resolution of acute, first-episode low back pain
.
Spine
. 1996;21:2763–2769
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
34.
34
Hides JA
, Stokes MJ
, Saide M
, Jull GA
, Cooper DH
.
Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle wasting ipsilateral to symptoms in patients with acute/subacute low back pain
.
Spine
. 1994;19:165–172
.
MEDLINE 35.
35
Rantanen J
, Hurme M
, Falck B
, et al.
The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation
.
Spine
. 1993;18:568–574
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
36.
36
Marshall K
, Walsh DM
, Baxter GD
.
The effect of a first vaginal delivery on the integrity of the pelvic floor musculature
.
Clin Rehabil
. 2002;16:795–799
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
37.
37
Thompson JF
, Roberts CL
, Currie M
, Ellwood DA
.
Prevalence and persistence of health problems after childbirth
(associations with parity and method of birth)
.
Birth
. 2002;29:83–94
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
38.
38
Kjolhede P
, Ryden G
.
Clinical and urodynamic characteristics of women with recurrent urinary incontinence after Burch colposuspension
.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
. 1997;76:461–467
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
39.
39
Svensson HO
, Andersson GB
, Hagstad A
, Jansson PO
.
The relationship of low-back pain to pregnancy and gynecologic factors
.
Spine
. 1990;15:371–375
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
40.
40
O’Sullivan P
, Twomey LT
, Allison GT
.
Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis
.
Spine
. 1997;22:2959–2967
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
41.
41
Stuge B
, Laerum E
, Kirkesola G
, Vollestad N
.
The efficacy of a treatment program focusing on specific stabilizing exercises for pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy
(a randomized controlled trial)
.
Spine
. 2004;29:351–359
.
CrossRef
42.
42
Smith BH
, Elliott AM
, Hannaford PC
, Chambers WA
, Smith WC
.
Factors related to the onset and persistence of chronic back pain in the community
(results from a general population follow-up study)
.
Spine
. 2004;29:1032–1040
.
CrossRef
43.
43
Akuthota V
, Nadler S
.
Core strengthening
.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
. 2004;85(3 Suppl 1):S86–S92
.
MEDLINE 44.
44
Hides J
, Jull GA
, Richardson CA
.
Long-term effects of specific stabilizing exercises for first-episode low back pain
.
Spine
. 2001;26:E243–E248
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
45.
45
Sapsford R
.
Rehabilitation of pelvic floor muscles utilizing trunk stabilization
.
Man Ther
. 2004;9:3–12
.
|
CrossRef
46.
46
Bo K
.
Urinary incontinence, pelvic floor dysfunction, exercise and sport
.
Sports Med
. 2004;34:451–464
.
MEDLINE |
CrossRef
a Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA b Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA c Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA d Department of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD e Department of General Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA Reprint requests to Jeffery J. Ericksen, MD, Dept of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, PO Box 980677, Richmond, VA 23298-0677
Supported by the National Institute on Aging (grant no. NO1AG12112). No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated. PII: S0003-9993(05)01281-5 doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.018 © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | |
|