« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 86, Issue 12,
Supplement
, Pages 101-114
, December 2005
Stroke Rehabilitation Patients, Practice, and Outcomes: Is Earlier and More Aggressive Therapy Better?
References
- . Opening the black box of poststroke rehabilitation (stroke rehabilitation patients, processes, and outcomes) . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2005;86(12 Suppl 2):S1–S7
- . Patterns of therapy activities across length of stay and impairment levels (peering inside the “black box” of inpatient stroke rehabilitation) . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2004;85:1901–1908
- . Randomized controlled trial of integrated (managed) care pathway for stroke rehabilitation . Stroke . 2000;31:1929–1934
- . What is the association between the different components of stroke rehabilitation and health outcomes? . Clin Rehabil . 2001;15:207–215
- . Unpacking the black box of therapy—a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke . Clin Rehabil . 1999;13:301–309
- . Comparison of the content of two physiotherapy approaches for stroke . Clin Rehabil . 2001;15:398–414
- Time use of stroke patients in an intensive rehabilitation unit (a comparison between a Belgian and a Swiss setting) . Disabil Rehabil . 2000;22:181–186
- . Clinical experience of rehabilitation therapists with chronic diseases (a quantitative approach) . Clin Rehabil . 1998;12:143–150
-
Contract No. HHS-100-97-0010
.
Medicare post-acute care: quality measurement final report. Appendix A. 1998 reports
.
Washington (DC): US. Department of Health and Human Services; 1998;
-
.
A practice analysis study of entry-level occupational therapists registered and certified occupational therapy assistant practice
.
Occup Ther J Res
. 2004;24(Suppl 1):s7–s31
- . Occupational therapy practice framework (domain and process) . Am J Occup Ther . 2002;56:609–639
- . A synthesis of the effects of occupational therapy for persons with stroke. Part II: remediation of impairments . Am J Occup Ther . 2002;56:260–274
- . Measuring aphasia treatment effects (large-group, small-group, and single-subject studies) . Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis . 1988;66:267–273
- . Research in physical medicine and rehabilitation. XII. Measurement tools with application to brain injury . Am J Phys Med Rehabil . 1991;70:40–56
- . Biofeedback in the treatment of a selected dysphagia patient . Dysphagia . 1991;6:140–144
- . Effectiveness of an attention training program . J Clin Exp Neuropsychol . 1987;9:117–130
- . Applying the clinical practice improvement approach to stroke rehabilitation (methods used and baseline results) . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2005;86(12 Suppl 2):S16–S33
- Physical therapy during stroke rehabilitation for people with different walking abilities . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2005;86(12 Suppl 2):S41–S50
- . Characterizing occupational therapy practice in stroke rehabilitation . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2005;86(12 Suppl 2):S51–S60
- . Characterizing speech and language pathology outcomes in stroke rehabilitation . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2005;86(12 Suppl 2):S61–S72
- . An exploration of central nervous system medication use and outcomes in stroke rehabilitation . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2005;86(12 Suppl 2):S73–S81
- . Nutrition support (tube feeding) as a rehabilitation intervention . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2005;86(12 Suppl 2):S82–S92
- . Timing of initiation of rehabilitation after stroke . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2005;86(12 Suppl 2):S34–S40
-
.
Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions
(using an inductive approach to examine the ‘black box’ of rehabilitation)
.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
. 2004;55:678–686
-
In:
Hart AC
, Schmidt KM
, Aaron WS
editor.
ICD-9-CM code book
. Reston: St. Anthony’s Publishing; 1999;
-
Epocrates. Available at: http://www2.epocrates.com. Accessed September 22, 2005.
- . The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke (a critical review of its measurement properties) . Neurorehabil Neural Repair . 2002;16:232–240
- . A comparison of stroke rehabilitation practice and outcomes between New Zealand and United States facilities . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2005;86(12 Suppl 2):S115–S120
Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133B990005) and the U.S. Army and Materiel Command (cooperative agreement award no. DAMD17-02-2-0032). The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this article are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision unless so designated by other documentation.No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(05)01277-3
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.016
© 2005 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 86, Issue 12,
Supplement
, Pages 101-114
, December 2005
