Journal Home
Search for

Volume 86, Issue 12, Supplement, Pages 73-81 (December 2005)


View previous. 12 of 18 View next.

An Exploration of Central Nervous System Medication Use and Outcomes in Stroke Rehabilitation

Brendan Conroy, MDa, Richard Zorowitz, MDb, Susan D. Horn, PhDcCorresponding Author Informationemail address, David K. Ryser, MDd, Jeff Teraoka, MDe, Randall J. Smout, MSc

Abstract 

Conroy B, Zorowitz R, Horn SD, Ryser DK, Teraoka J, Smout RJ. An exploration of central nervous system medication use and outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.

Objective

To study associations between neurobehavioral impairments, use of neurotropic medications, and outcomes for inpatient stroke rehabilitation, controlling for a variety of confounding variables.

Design

Observational cohort study of poststroke rehabilitation.

Setting

Six inpatient rehabilitation hospitals in the United States.

Participants

Patients with moderate or severe strokes (N=919).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Discharge disposition, FIM score change, and rehabilitation length of stay (LOS).

Results

Neurobehavioral impairments and use of many medications, including first-generation selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, older traditional antipsychotic medications, and anti-Parkinsonian neurostimulants, have a statistical association with poorer outcomes, whereas use of the atypical antipsychotic medications has a positive association with improvement in motor FIM scores. Counterintuitively, use of opioid analgesics is associated with a larger motor FIM score change but not an increase in LOS or reduced percentage of discharge to community. There was significant variation in use of neurotropic medications among the 6 study sites during inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

Conclusions

There are many opportunities to enhance a stroke survivor’s ability to benefit from acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation through improved understanding of associations of neurotropic medications with outcomes for different patient groups.

a Stroke Recovery Program, National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC

b Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA

c International Severity Information Systems Inc and Institute for Clinical Outcomes Research, Salt Lake City, UT

d Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neuro Specialty Rehabilitation Unit, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT

e Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Susan D. Horn, PhD, Institute for Clinical Outcomes Research, 699 E South Temple, Ste 100, Salt Lake City, UT 84102-1282

 Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133B990005) and the U.S. Army and Materiel Command (cooperative agreement award no. DAMD17-02-2-0032). The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this article are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision unless so designated by other documentation.

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(05)01197-4

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.129


View previous. 12 of 18 View next.