Journal Home
Search for

Volume 86, Issue 12, Supplement, Pages 61-72 (December 2005)


View previous. 11 of 18 View next.

Characterizing Speech and Language Pathology Outcomes in Stroke Rehabilitation

Brooke Hatfield, MS, CCC-SLPbCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Deborah Millet, MS, CCC-SLPc, Janice Coles, MS, CCC-SLPb, Julie Gassaway, MS, RNd, Brendan Conroy, MDa, Randall J. Smout, MSd

Abstract 

Hatfield B, Millet D, Coles J, Gassaway J, Conroy B, Smout RJ. Characterizing speech and language pathology outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.

Objectives

To describe a subset of speech-language pathology (SLP) patients in the Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project and to examine outcomes for patients with low admission FIM levels of auditory comprehension and verbal expression.

Design

Observational cohort study.

Setting

Five inpatient rehabilitation hospitals.

Participants

Patients (N=397) receiving poststroke SLP with admission FIM cognitive components at levels 1 through 5.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

Increase in comprehension and expression FIM scores from admission to discharge.

Results

Cognitively and linguistically complex SLP activities (problem-solving and executive functioning skills) were associated with greater likelihood of success in low- to mid-level functioning communicators in the acute poststroke rehabilitation period.

Conclusions

The results challenge common clinical practice by suggesting that use of high-level cognitively and linguistically complex SLP activities early in a patient’s stay may result in more efficient practice and better outcomes regardless of the patient’s functional communication severity level on admission.

a Stroke Recovery Program, Washington, DC

b National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC

c Neuro Specialty Rehabilitation, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT

d International Severity Information Systems Inc, Salt Lake City, UT

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Brooke Hatfield, MS, CCC-SLP, National Rehabilitation Hospital, 102 Irving St NW, Washington, DC 20010

 Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133B990005) and the U.S. Army and Materiel Command (cooperative agreement award no. DAMD17-02-2-0032). The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this article are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision unless so designated by other documentation.

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(05)01143-3

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.111


View previous. 11 of 18 View next.