Journal Home
Search for

Volume 86, Issue 12, Supplement, Pages 82-92 (December 2005)


View previous. 13 of 18 View next.

Nutrition Support (Tube Feeding) as a Rehabilitation Intervention

Roberta James, MStata, Deon Gines, RD, CD, PhDb, Angela Menlove, MS, CCC-SLPb, Susan D. Horn, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Julie Gassaway, MS, RNa, Randall J. Smout, MSa

Abstract 

James R, Gines D, Menlove A, Horn SD, Gassaway J, Smout RJ. Nutrition support (tube feeding) as a rehabilitation intervention.

Objective

To describe site variation in use of enteral feeding and its association with stroke rehabilitation outcomes, controlling for a variety of confounding variables.

Design

Prospective observational cohort study.

Setting

Six inpatient rehabilitation facilities in the United States.

Participants

Patients (N=919) from the Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project database with moderate or severe stroke who were discharged to home, community, or skilled nursing facility.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Change in total, motor, and cognitive FIM instrument scores and change in severity of illness.

Results

Monitoring of nutritional status and the frequency of tube-feeding interventions for patients with moderate and severe stroke varied significantly among sites. Patients with tube feeding had higher severity of illness and lower functioning on admission compared with patients who did not receive tube feeding. However, when we controlled for severity of illness, admission FIM score, and other important covariates, we found that patients with severe strokes who were tube fed for more than 25% of their stay had greater increases in total, motor, and cognitive FIM scores and greater improvement in severity of illness by discharge.

Conclusions

Nutrition support (tube feeding) is an effective therapy in rehabilitation service for patients with severe strokes and is associated with greater motor and cognitive improvements, even in patients with the most severe strokes.

a Institute for Clinical Outcomes Research, International Severity Information Systems Inc, Salt Lake City, UT

b Rehabilitation Department, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Susan D. Horn, Institute for Clinical Outcomes Research, 699 E South Temple, Ste 100, Salt Lake City, UT 84102-1282

 Supported by the National Institute on Disability & Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133B990005) and U.S. Army and Materiel Command (cooperative agreement award no. DAMD17-02-2-0032). The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this article are those of the authors and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision unless so designated by other documentation.

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(05)01142-1

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.314


View previous. 13 of 18 View next.