Volume 86, Issue 6 , Pages 1141-1146, June 2005
Factor Structure of the Pain Disability Index in Workers’ Compensation Claimants With Low Back Injuries
Abstract
Tait RC, Chibnall JT. Factor structure of the Pain Disability Index in workers’ compensation claimants with low back injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1141–6.
Objective
To examine the factor structure of a telephone-administered Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the effects of race and sex on the PDI.
Design
Computer-assisted telephone interviews of a cohort with occupational low back injuries.
Setting
General community.
Participants
Missouri workers’ compensation claimants (N=1329) with low back injuries.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
PDI, levels of pain severity, Social Security Disability Insurance status, and the Fear-Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire.
Results
Results for the total sample and by race/sex group indicated support for a 2-factor model of the PDI corresponding to voluntary activities (eg, social, occupational, recreational) and obligatory activities (eg, activities of daily living, eating, sleeping). Additional psychometric analyses of the voluntary and obligatory subscales indicated adequate reliability and construct validity overall and in each of the race/sex groups. African Americans reported more pain-related disability on both subscales than whites. Women reported more disability on the voluntary subscale than men.
Conclusions
The results support use of the PDI as a bidimensional measure of pain-related disability, with strong psychometric properties. They also support its administration by telephone.
Key Words: Disability evaluation , Low back pain , Occupational medicine , Rehabilitation , Workers’ compensation
Supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (grant no. R01 HS014007-01).No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(05)00080-8
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.030
© 2005 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 86, Issue 6 , Pages 1141-1146, June 2005
