Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 86, Issue 5 , Pages 889-895, May 2005

Impairment and Partial Recovery of Medical Decision-Making Capacity in Traumatic Brain Injury: A 6-Month Longitudinal Study

  • Daniel C. Marson, JD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.
    • Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Daniel C. Marson, JD, PhD, Dept of Neurology, Rm JT1216, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233-7340.
  • ,
  • Laura E. Dreer, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.
    • Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.
  • ,
  • Sara Krzywanski, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.
    • Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.
  • ,
  • Justin S. Huthwaite, PsyD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.
    • Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.
  • ,
  • Michael J. DeVivo, DrPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.
  • ,
  • Thomas A. Novack, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.

Abstract 

Marson DC, Dreer LE, Krzywanski S, Huthwaite JS, DeVivo MJ, Novack TA. Impairment and partial recovery of medical decision-making capacity in traumatic brain injury: a 6-month longitudinal study.

Objective

To investigate empirically change in medical decision-making capacity (MDC) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Design

Longitudinal study comparing control and TBI groups at hospitalization and at 6 months postinjury.

Setting

Inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit.

Participants

Twenty healthy controls and 24 patients with moderate to severe TBI.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main outcome measures

MDC was measured by using the Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument (CCTI). The CCTI evaluates performance on a series of 4 accepted consent abilities, or standards: S1 (evidencing/communicating choice), S3 (appreciating consequences), S4 (reasoning about treatment), and S5 (understanding the treatment situation and choices), and 1 experimental standard [S2] (making the reasonable treatment choice when the alternative choice is unreasonable). In addition, TBI patients were assigned 1 of 3 capacity outcomes (capable, marginally capable, incapable) for each standard.

Results

At hospitalization, TBI patients performed equivalently with controls on standards S1 and [S2] but significantly below controls on S3 (P<.001), S4 (P<.02), and S5 (P<.001). At 6-month follow-up, TBI patients showed significant within-group improvement on these 3 standards (S3, S4, S5) but continued to fall significantly below controls on S3 (P<.006) and S5 (P<.001). A group by time interaction emerged on S5 (P<.02). The TBI group showed increasing proportions of capable outcomes on all standards over the 6 months.

Conclusions

Patients with TBI showed initial impairment and subsequent partial recovery of MDC over a 6-month period. Complex consent abilities of appreciation, reasoning, and understanding were significantly impaired in hospitalized acute TBI patients. At follow-up, TBI patients showed substantial recovery of reasoning and partial recovery of appreciation and understanding consent abilities. The study suggests the importance in the rehabilitation setting of serial evaluations of MDC in patients with TBI.

Key words:  Brain injuries , Decision making , Mental competency , Rehabilitation

 

 Supported primarily by the UAB Traumatic Brain Injury Care System, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133A980010), the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health (grant no. 1P50 AG16582-01), and the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health (grant no. U01 AG 10483-12), and National Institute on Child Health and Human Development (grant no. T32 HDO7420).No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the author(s) or on any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(04)01417-0

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.020

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 86, Issue 5 , Pages 889-895, May 2005