Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 86, Issue 3 , Pages 399-402, March 2005

Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke

  • Stephen J. Page, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
    • Institute for Health Policy and Health Services Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
    • Neuromotor Recovery and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Drake Rehabilitation Center, Cincinnati, OH
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Stephen J. Page, PhD, Dept of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 202 Goodman Dr, Ste 275, Cincinnati, OH 45267
  • ,
  • Peter Levine, BA, PTA

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Health Policy and Health Services Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
    • Neuromotor Recovery and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Drake Rehabilitation Center, Cincinnati, OH
  • ,
  • Anthony C. Leonard, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Health Policy and Health Services Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH

Abstract 

Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard AC. Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke.

Objective

To determine the efficacy of a mental practice (MP) protocol in increasing the function and use of the more affected limb in stroke patients.

Design

Randomized, controlled, multiple baseline, pre-post, case series.

Setting

Outpatient rehabilitation hospital.

Participants

Eleven patients who had a stroke more than 1 year before study entry (9 men; mean age, 62.3±5.1y; range, 53–71y; mean time since stroke, 23.8mo; range, 15–48mo; 10 strokes exhibiting upper-limb hemiparesis on the dominant side) and who exhibited affected arm hemiparesis and nonuse.

Intervention

All patients received 30-minute therapy sessions 2 days a week for 6 weeks. The sessions emphasized activities of daily living (ADLs): 6 subjects randomly assigned to the MP condition concurrently received sessions requiring daily MP of the ADLs; 5 subjects (control group) received an intervention consisting of relaxation techniques.

Main outcome measures

The Motor Activity Log and Action Research Arm (ARA) test.

Results

Affected limb use as rated by MP patients and their caregivers increased (1.55, 1.66, respectively), as did patient and caregiver ratings of quality of movement (2.33, 2.15, respectively) and ARA scores (10.7). In contrast, the controls showed nominal increases in the amount they used their affected limb and in limb function. A Wilcoxon test on the ARA scores revealed significantly (P=.004) greater changes in the MP group’s scores.

Conclusions

Participation in an MP protocol may increase a stroke patient’s use of his/her more affected limb. Data further support that the protocol resulted in correlative, MP-induced, motor function improvements. The mechanisms whereby MP increases affected arm use are unknown. Perhaps using the more affected limb becomes more salient through MP, or perhaps motor schema are altered during MP to integrate limb use.

Key words:  Exercise therapy , Mental processes , Rehabilitation , Stroke

 

 Supported by the Retirement Research Foundation (grant no. 2001-037).No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(04)01247-X

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.002

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 86, Issue 3 , Pages 399-402, March 2005