Volume 86, Issue 3 , Pages 498-504, March 2005
Fracture threshold in the femur and tibia of people with spinal cord injury as determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography
Abstract
Eser P, Frotzler A, Zehnder Y, Denoth J. Fracture threshold in the femur and tibia of people with spinal cord injury as determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography.
Objective
To determine bone traits of the femur and tibia with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) that best distinguish between spinal cord injury (SCI) subjects with and without fractures.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Setting
In- and outpatient paraplegic center in Switzerland.
Participants
Ninety-nine motor complete SCI subjects (duration of paralysis, 2mo–49y), 21 of whom had sustained fractures of the femur or tibia.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main outcome measures
Subjects with SCI were questioned about the occurrence, location, and approximate date of fractures to their lower extremities. Trabecular and cortical bone mineral density (BMD), as well as bone geometric properties of distal epiphyses and midshafts of the femur and tibia, were measured by pQCT.
Results
Trabecular BMD of the femur and tibia distal epiphyses was found to distinguish best subjects with fractures from those without. Fractures occurred in subjects with trabecular BMD of less than 114mg/cm3 and less than 72mg/cm3 for the femoral and tibial distal epiphysis, respectively (corresponding to 46% and 29% of mean values of an able-bodied reference group). Approximately 50% of the subjects with chronic SCI (defined as time postinjury >5y for femur data and >7y for tibia data) had trabecular BMD values above the fracture threshold in the femur and about one third above the fracture threshold in the tibia.
Conclusions
By using pQCT, it may be possible to identify subjects with SCI who are at risk of sustaining fractures of the femur and tibia through minor trauma.
Key words: Bone density , Fractures , Rehabilitation , Spinal cord injuries
Supported by the Swiss Paraplegic Foundation.No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the author(s) or on any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(04)01241-9
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.006
© 2005 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 86, Issue 3 , Pages 498-504, March 2005
